Ick quarantine question

JAMSOURY

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2017
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
467
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
If I have two fish in a quarantine because of ick and another fish catches ick from the display and I put it in the quarantine as well, will I need to restart the 30 days cure on all fish or just the one that got sick?
 
If I have two fish in a quarantine because of ick and another fish catches ick from the display and I put it in the quarantine as well, will I need to restart the 30 days cure on all fish or just the one that got sick?
If you have ick in your display tank, your best bet is to get all fish out and into quarantine and medicate them. Then keep them in there and let your display tank go fallow for at least 76 days to make sure the ick has died off. Otherwise after treatment (30 days) if you put the fish back in it'll just come right back.
 
Ok to clarify a bit more. So if I had a fish in copper for 10 days, then put another fish with ick in the same quarantine tank, should I start the 30 days over for all fish? Or can I remove the other one after his 30 days are over?
 
Ok to clarify a bit more. So if I had a fish in copper for 10 days, then put another fish with ick in the same quarantine tank, should I start the 30 days over for all fish? Or can I remove the other one after his 30 days are over?
I would just to be safe. But perhaps #reefsquad may have a better answer.
 
It is stressful to be in copper that long (it's a poison, after all - which affects the parasites slightly more than the fish). If you can remove the first fish to a new, clean QT (don't lower copper in the old one - full strength until he's in the new tank), you should be able to get that guy out of copper at 30 days. Some folks have moved them out of copper and into a new QT at as little as 14 days ... but that method offers _zero_ wiggle room!

Otherwise, yes ... the clock re-starts at zero.

~Bruce
 
In this particular case, the clock does not start over IF you move the first fish out of the QT into a clean tank. You still need to maintain copper levels in the original QT for at least 30 days after the introduction of the last fish.

We know that copper quickly kills free swimming ich and prevents it from infecting fish. We also know that the ich can only feed on the fish for a maximum of 7 days. In theory, after 7 days at proper copper levels the fish should be completely free of the parasite.

So why the 30 day treatment then? Lets say that a new ich parasite (called a theront at this stage) infects your fish right before you put it into your QT. It spends a maximum of 7 days feeding on the fish (trophont stage). It leaves the fish as a Protomont (normally only a few hours) and looks for a hard surface on which to reproduce in what is called the tomont stage. Anywhere from 3 to 72 days later the tomonts hatch and release new theronts to start the cycle over.

Copper is most effective at killing ich when it is a theront. After 7 days at proper copper levels this means no new tomonts can be formed, which means no new theronts can be hatched. However, during that first 7 days there may be tomonts that formed and can hatch in that 3 to 72 day window. In proper copper, these new theronts are quickly killed before they can infect a fish. This is why a fish in proper copper levels is clean after 7 days. So why the extra 23 days if the fish is clean at this point? It can take 2 to 3 weeks for the copper to genetically alter the tomonts enough to prevent viable theronts. Once there are no viable tomonts it is safe to remove the copper.

That was the long way of saying that the first 7 days of a 30 day treatment is to get the fish clean. Days 8 through 30 are to keep the fish safe while making sure the tank is clean.

Some folks have moved them out of copper and into a new QT at as little as 14 days ... but that method offers _zero_ wiggle room!

I think we disagree on this and 14 days is my new preference. I feel this offers plenty of wiggle room. I do know some people only treat this way for 9 days which does offer zero wiggle room. With this method, instead of treating the tank, you remove the fish from the tank so that tomonts are not an issue. I also find it easier to maintain proper copper levels for 14 days than it is for 30. The big down side to this method is that you need to set up and maintain 2 complete QT systems with completely separate equipment or you risk cross contamination. Many people find setting up a single QT to be challenging so asking people to set up 2 of them doesn't go over very well.
 
If the fish is clear of ich in 14 days why aren't all protocols just 14 days then add to display tank?
 
Ok to clarify a bit more. So if I had a fish in copper for 10 days, then put another fish with ick in the same quarantine tank, should I start the 30 days over for all fish? Or can I remove the other one after his 30 days are over?
Start the clock over.
 
If the fish is clear of ich in 14 days why aren't all protocols just 14 days then add to display tank?
Margin of error and different strains of ich/velvet with varied range of life cycles
 
If the fish is clear of ich in 14 days why aren't all protocols just 14 days then add to display tank?
The fish are free and clear of both Ich and Velvet after 7 days at full copper. This doesn't mean they are healthy. They may have developed a bacterial infection from any parasite damage. They may have flukes or other conditions. I also feel it is better to give fish a recovery time away from the DT after treating with meds. That is why my preference is now to treat for 14 days and move to a clean QT where I can observe, do additional treatments, and let them recover.
 
In this particular case, the clock does not start over IF you move the first fish out of the QT into a clean tank. You still need to maintain copper levels in the original QT for at least 30 days after the introduction of the last fish.

We know that copper quickly kills free swimming ich and prevents it from infecting fish. We also know that the ich can only feed on the fish for a maximum of 7 days. In theory, after 7 days at proper copper levels the fish should be completely free of the parasite.

So why the 30 day treatment then? Lets say that a new ich parasite (called a theront at this stage) infects your fish right before you put it into your QT. It spends a maximum of 7 days feeding on the fish (trophont stage). It leaves the fish as a Protomont (normally only a few hours) and looks for a hard surface on which to reproduce in what is called the tomont stage. Anywhere from 3 to 72 days later the tomonts hatch and release new theronts to start the cycle over.

Copper is most effective at killing ich when it is a theront. After 7 days at proper copper levels this means no new tomonts can be formed, which means no new theronts can be hatched. However, during that first 7 days there may be tomonts that formed and can hatch in that 3 to 72 day window. In proper copper, these new theronts are quickly killed before they can infect a fish. This is why a fish in proper copper levels is clean after 7 days. So why the extra 23 days if the fish is clean at this point? It can take 2 to 3 weeks for the copper to genetically alter the tomonts enough to prevent viable theronts. Once there are no viable tomonts it is safe to remove the copper.

That was the long way of saying that the first 7 days of a 30 day treatment is to get the fish clean. Days 8 through 30 are to keep the fish safe while making sure the tank is clean.



I think we disagree on this and 14 days is my new preference. I feel this offers plenty of wiggle room. I do know some people only treat this way for 9 days which does offer zero wiggle room. With this method, instead of treating the tank, you remove the fish from the tank so that tomonts are not an issue. I also find it easier to maintain proper copper levels for 14 days than it is for 30. The big down side to this method is that you need to set up and maintain 2 complete QT systems with completely separate equipment or you risk cross contamination. Many people find setting up a single QT to be challenging so asking people to set up 2 of them doesn't go over very well.

This is some awesome information. Imma save it! Thanks!!
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top