Increasing salinity - concentration of parameters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Myka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Myka

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
1,041
Reaction score
676
Location
SK, Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So 35 ppt is 3.5% salt by weight, correct?

So if someone lists parameters at 33 ppt, then the difference is only 0.2%, correct?

For example, if someone reads salinity at 33 ppt and calcium at say 400 ppm, then if the tank evaporates to 35 ppt, the calcium would be 400.8 ppm assuming no calcium is used up in the tank., correct?

o_O
 
No the difference is 1-(35/33) = 6%. If Ca = 400 PPM @ 33 PPT, and that is allowed to evaporate to 35 PPT, then Ca will then = 400 * 35 /33 = 424.3 PPM. In terms of how you were trying to approach the problem, think of the difference as being 0.2 / 3.3, which is also 6% and not just the 0.2% alone.
 
No the difference is 1-(35/33) = 6%. If Ca = 400 PPM @ 33 PPT, and that is allowed to evaporate to 35 PPT, then Ca will then = 400 * 35 /33 = 424.3 PPM. In terms of how you were trying to approach the problem, think of the difference as being 0.2 / 3.3, which is also 6% and not just the 0.2% alone.
Thanks Jim. That makes more sense considering test results. That's why I was asking. My brain said the difference is tiny, my test kits over the years tell me otherwise. :)
 
Thinking about this again @JimWelsh, why did my brain not figure this out years ago? I'm smarted than that! o_O
 
By how much would Alk change then?If it were at 7.5dKH
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top