Mostly agreed with
@oddomatic . While I'm not aware of any of the species on the NPS PDF he linked to being common or heavily used in the ornamental reef tank industry, the criteria are very arbitrary. Julian Sprung gave a presentation about this several MACNAs ago* (my further babbling on it is in
this post):
To bring it back to the topic at hand, regulations like this is what a big coral seller like
@PacificEastAquaculture has to deal with. I'm fine with not taking truly endangered species, but the sometimes unscienftific arbitrariness of the classification (as I understand it: according to US law/administrative procedures: basically there has to be a lot of damage to its habitat
in the US. The fact that it's very well aquacultured, and abundant elsewhere, does not seem to matter), the ease of which it's challenged by activists, the fact that we're a niche hobby, and the rate that some people will deny it makes my head spin.
Several years ago, as I understand it US FWS funded a study to see if giant clams should be banned for trade in the US -from any source, for any reason - prompted by an activist campaign. But it obviously didn't go through.