Is skimmate really that bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zizzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Zizzer

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 28, 2023
Messages
64
Reaction score
28
Location
Tuscaloosa
What state or country do you live in
Alabama
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a 20 gallon back up tank / Qt tank that I've been dumping skimmate in for a couple months now that I get from my 75 gallon DT skimmer. I've never changed the water, only added rodi water to top it off. I tested the phosphate and Nitrate today in the backup tank. I was expecting both to be pretty high but phosphate was .06 and Nitrate was 10.6. There's no fish in it. Just copepods, sand and nuisance algae. I'm just a little confused as to how I keep throwing skimmate into a tank with no chemical filtration, just foam and ceramic tiles in a hob filter, yet the phosphate and nitrates are not very high.
 
You are not feeding fish and introducing phosphorous, nitrogen, but also not any traces like potassium, iodine, etc.

There are biological processes in each tank that can lower no3 - anoxic bacteria. po4 will bind to equilibrium with the aragonite - the rock/sand can hold a lot and can mask a phosphate overages for quite some time

It is easy to keep waste products like no3 and po4 down when you are not feeding anything/much.
 
I have a 20 gallon back up tank / Qt tank that I've been dumping skimmate in for a couple months now that I get from my 75 gallon DT skimmer. I've never changed the water, only added rodi water to top it off. I tested the phosphate and Nitrate today in the backup tank. I was expecting both to be pretty high but phosphate was .06 and Nitrate was 10.6. There's no fish in it. Just copepods, sand and nuisance algae. I'm just a little confused as to how I keep throwing skimmate into a tank with no chemical filtration, just foam and ceramic tiles in a hob filter, yet the phosphate and nitrates are not very high.
I'm confused as to why you would do it in the first place - however, to answer your question - the algae is taking up some, and there are probably lots of unmeasured organics in the water - I would certainly not use it for a QT tank for many reasons
 
Your skimmer likely removed some harsh metals bound to organics - a good thing. Adding those back is usually not a good idea. They are many, many functions that a skimmer performs and many, many things that it removes and only a small portion of them have to do with nitrate and phosphate.
 
Woe. Thank you. I had no idea that the sand/ araganite could absorb phosphate. That kind of blew me away after I looked it up. That really just opens up a whole bunch of more questions I want to look up. Like how fast can sand leak out the phosphate verses how fast it aborbs it.
 
I had started this experiment to see if it would help a copepod bloom. Which it seemed to have done that.
 
Aragonite can bind and unbind quickly like a day for the material on the surface. It takes a bit longer for water to get into the sand and rock but it binds once it gets there. Think of it as pretty fluid with hourly/daily adjustments.
 
Also, the nuisance algae in the system is quite good at lowering testable NO3 & PO4.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top