light timeing

HookedonSalt

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Location
Satellite Beach, Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am very curious my LFS explained I should have just my blues on in the morning, blues/ whites on during the day only the blues in the evening and then off completely at night... Not so much are they wrong but why is that? What gives the ultimate growth and why not just whites?
 
HookedonSalt

Your question may have opened the Pandora's Box on debate. Perhaps more consequential than who is prettier? Mary Ann or Ginger?

Back in the day There were three common MH Bulbs... The 65K Bulbs which were way yellow but had a very nice 450nm spike for about $65. These were commonly used to grow "tomatos" in ones basement and a favorite of reefers on a budget:sad:.

The other two MH Bulbs available were the Ushio and Radium but were well over $100 each.

At this time I've seen outstanding LPS tanks lit with only 110 watt VHO 420nm, but personally could only afford the Iwasiki 65K. Growth was great but looks were simply OK. Even tried blue glass but that got too hot and cracked...(Note this was still when one could find Meat Loaf on 8 track)...

Sanjay has done some excellent work listing the spectrum of these bulbs and without has the most qualified opinion on the best schedule.

This is only my experience...

The deeper you dive the more blue you have. Past 30 meters the reds, greens and yellows are gone. The Zooanthellea algae in the corals have adapted to receive the blue or 420-470nm

Here is a spectrum chart for the most common Chlorophyll A&B

6a010535f11c3d970c0153913a22d7970b-800wi.jpg


I have found the 450nm the sweet spot in growth. This is your Royal Blue XT-E

The Cree Cool White has a serious 450nm spike which is why its good for growth as well.

Overall its your choice on looks or what light makes your corals look prettier (Ginger v Mary Ann) but growth is the 420-470 or simply the 450-460nm Cree Royal Blue.

Bill
 
Last edited:
HookedonSalt

Your question may have opened the Pandora's Box on debate. Perhaps more consequential than who is prettier? Mary Ann or Ginger?

Back in the day There were three common MH Bulbs... The 65K Bulbs which were way yellow but had a very nice 450nm spike for about $65. These were commonly used to grow "tomatos" in ones basement and a favorite of reefers on a budget:sad:.

The other two MH Bulbs available were the Ushio and Radium but were well over $100 each.

At this time I've seen outstanding LPS tanks lit with only 110 watt VHO 420nm, but personally could only afford the Iwasiki 65K. Growth was great but looks were simply OK. Even tried blue glass but that got too hot and cracked...(Note this was still when one could find Meat Loaf on 8 track)...

Sanjay has done some excellent work listing the spectrum of these bulbs and without has the most qualified opinion on the best schedule.

This is only my experience...

The deeper you dive the more blue you have. Past 30 meters the reds, greens and yellows are gone. The Zooanthellea algae in the corals have adapted to receive the blue or 420-470nm

Here is a spectrum chart for the most common Chlorophyll A&B

6a010535f11c3d970c0153913a22d7970b-800wi.jpg


I have found the 450nm the sweet spot in growth. This is your Royal Blue XT-E

The Cree Cool White has a serious 450nm spike which is why its good for growth as well.

Overall its your choice on looks or what light makes your corals look prettier (Ginger v Mary Ann) but growth is the 420-470 or simply the 450-460nm Cree Royal Blue.

Bill

He nailed it. I agree totally.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top