Low flow through BRS reactor?

telsonman

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 28, 2017
Messages
200
Reaction score
88
Location
Northeast GA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I got a BRS dual reactor and plumbed it from my return. It still seems that I do not have enough flow through the GFO. I barely get a small bubble effect. If you look at the surface of the GFO, it has basically just a small roll to it. Its so small it seems like there are just a few channels of water going up through it in a few areas, and they come out the top, but you can't see any movement through the rest. There isn't any "slow churn" to it, like in the BRS videos.

My return pump is a Jebao(Jecod) DCS-4000. Before adding the reactor, I had the ball valves on the tank drain and return set to about 80% open, and the pump was set on the lowest setting (10%?). So I added the reactor plumping by using a t on the return (3/4 pvc) and adding a push connect fitting for the tube. There is a ball valve for the T itself, and then the reactor also has a ball valve. With both of those wide open, on the low setting, there was no movement of the GFO. I cranked the return pump to the max, and there was still no movement. The only way I could get the above minimal movement was to close both the drain and return main ball valves to about 25% open, which slowed the flow through my sump to a mere easy creep.

I don't understand how that reactor could need so much flow. I was trying to avoid adding a MJ1200(which I have) because it was just another cord to look at and a socket to take up on my apex.

Any ideas here on how I can get the proper flow through this reactor with what I have? The sump is an Eshopps R-100 Gen 3. I wanted a DCT-5000 in the return compartment, but it wouldn't fit, so I downgraded to a 4000. I have a reef octopus 150int in the skimmer compartment with a 300w heater. Space is limited in the R-100.
 
I tried using an MJ-600 on my BRS Reactor for GFO, using their Deluxe Reactor, 2 Cups of GFO and I had a hard time getting any kind of tumble. Switched to a MJ1200 I had and have had great results with the valve maybe 1/4 open. I think it needs the pressure from the stronger pump to drive through the media. As a newb it definately took me a few to get the MJ1200 tuned in right, I kept shooting the GFO too the top of the reactor, but now I am comfortable with it and glad I went with the MJ1200, eventually I will tie it into my return.
 
I hooked the MJ1200 to it. Huge difference. I barely have the push connect ball valve open and I get a good flow. It just doesn't make sense how a return that is rated up to 1056gph can't match the flow of a pump that is 296gph, even with being T'ed off
 
I have a 1200gph return and a 90g display with two seperate reactors on a mainfold. I have my return line set at around 50% to run both reactors, so your situation probably isnt uncommon.

Im guessing the water return is probably taking the least path of resistance. So closing my ball valve is the only way to get enough back pressure to feed my manifold.

Attached it an older picture of my mainfold. I now have two reactors but you can see my valve partially closed.

20170210_010551.jpg
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top