Macro Photography

Yahtzee170

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 6, 2017
Messages
45
Reaction score
27
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm trying to take more shots of my tank and struggling to get the close up shots I want.

I'm using a Sony A7III with a G master 24-70 mm F2.8 lens. I also have access to 16-50 mm F3.5-5.6 and 55-210 mm F4.5-6.3 from a Sony A6000. At this point I can't justify purchasing a specific macro lens. Would an extension tube make a significant difference? Any recommendations for Sony E-mount?

I'd like to get shots like this, but much clearer.

DSC00021.jpg
 
Do you have a tube for the lens? I use a 60mm for colonies and 100mm for stuff far away or frags. You should be fine with the lens you have already.
 
You can use the A to E adapter from Sony to use the A mount/Minolta lenses. Minolta's f2.8 100mm ($150-300 used on ebay) uses the same glass as Sony's f2.8 100mm macro that runs $1100.
 
I use macro extension rings with my 5d. Gives me plenty of options with a 24-105 zoom, though there is a significant amount of light loss. I have the best luck with coral 1-5" from the glass. Lot's of aftermarket options that will work with the Sony E mount. Good idea to also invest in a decent tripod.
 
Do you have a tube for the lens? I use a 60mm for colonies and 100mm for stuff far away or frags. You should be fine with the lens you have already.

I don’t have an extension tube yet. Anything to look for in purchasing one? A quick search showed a range from $20 to a couple hundred.

Would it make sense to get an E to A converter and A tubes? Or preferable to just get an e mount tube.
 
A few from the combo I referenced above. Handheld with no color correction. Post processing consisted of cropping, exposure, and contrast.

Flatworms crawling around on the purple scroll
48794315486_ddf549a777_h.jpg


Tri-color that was just about dead but is bouncing back
48794455937_1c41e1cf6f_h.jpg


Tyree's pink lemonade
48794316221_90d657e67d_h.jpg


Asterina running around the monti undata
48794458072_c02fc4da34_h.jpg


JF lepto
48794580722_7baf164b0b_h.jpg
 
A few from the combo I referenced above. Handheld with no color correction. Post processing consisted of cropping, exposure, and contrast.

Flatworms crawling around on the purple scroll
48794315486_ddf549a777_h.jpg


Tri-color that was just about dead but is bouncing back
48794455937_1c41e1cf6f_h.jpg


Tyree's pink lemonade
48794316221_90d657e67d_h.jpg


Asterina running around the monti undata
48794458072_c02fc4da34_h.jpg


JF lepto
48794580722_7baf164b0b_h.jpg

Those photos look great. I think I'm going to try an extension tube first to see if I can do something similar, but if that doesn't work I'll try that lens. Thanks!
 
These shot are great, especially for taking them by hand. However, you can improve on these pictures by utilizing a tripod and macro rail. Take a series of photos moving further away (micro movements) with each shot, and then use Photoshop or lightroom to stack the photos. This will give you a picture that is fully in focus instead of just a small section of it. You can find cheap macro rails on Amazon for ~$20.
 
This is straight from camera shot jpeg, ... no post processing at all ... I think I got the color balance zeroed in .... it is set cloudy+3 ....what do you think?
Not very colorful, but very close to what my eye sees.

DSC_0066.JPG DSC_0067.JPG
 
Last edited:

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top