Mature tank vs immature tank

With these “grow like weeds” coral will they be slower growth in a newer tank and faster in a more mature tank? Or does tank age not even matter?
Very much matters. Nothing thrived when my tank was young. After the years now things grow like weeds as you said.
 
@Jekyl interesting my tank is 6 months and just have almost all fast growing corals and yet to see this quick growth
6 months is nothing. My ugly phase hadn't even really kicked in at 6 months. Over a year is when the shift started.
 
Competition for available resources comes to my mind. Maybe if you had ONE gsp you'd see the fast growth others espouse... just my theory...
 
Competition for available resources comes to my mind. Maybe if you had ONE gsp you'd see the fast growth others espouse... just my theory...
Keep it at latest 5" away from main structure. GSP is a vile weed IMO.
 
With these “grow like weeds” coral will they be slower growth in a newer tank and faster in a more mature tank? Or does tank age not even matter?
Corals thrive in both environments but obviously best in a tank with stability and maturity.
I just set up a 400g in the last couple of days and transferred everything over and a member who stopped last night mentioned tank looks 5 years old as everything was wide open
 
Last edited:
In my limited experience, YES. Corals that “grow like weed” still grow very slowly until the tank becomes established.

I added this digitata and stylo on day 1.

AF6D24EB-505F-47AD-BC0D-AC4D6359156D.jpeg
AC9D36E3-F94C-4A8A-B756-D8A3D021F8A1.jpeg


I believe my tank was established at around the 8 month mark. It went through 2 dino outbreaks and several cyano/other algae outbreaks until that point.

Here are the same two corals at 8 month after tank start. Almost no growth in 8 months.
6B060668-F5B6-42CA-BDA8-C9FAAE694046.jpeg


Fast forward to 18 month after tank start, they are growing like weed. (Apologies for the bad pic).
2A9BDFDA-B7A5-45B3-ABB9-4FA5F13EEC3B.jpeg


On the other hand, I added this Cali Tort ,10 months after tank start, when I consider my tank to be established.
48F898FC-1885-4F18-B54B-8A92AA707D70.jpeg


This is 17 months after tank start (7 month of growth). It is significantly bigger now even after I took a couple frags.
77FEA3B6-460B-4118-906E-4A7B15BD5A3D.jpeg


Thus leading me to the conclusion that even “grows like weed” corals (at least SPS) will grow slower in a new tank vs an established tank.
 
In otherwords an older tank will be more "figured out" than a newer tank, and corals don't like when you have to figure things out while they are in the tank.
 
Corals thrive in both environments but obviously best in a tank with stability and marurity.
I just set up a 400g in the last couple of days and transferred everything over and a member who stopped last night mentioned tank looks 5 years old as everything was wide open
A bit off topic but I'm wanting to transfer my livestock to a new setup too. Does it need a cycle or will my current live rock etc be sufficient? I have a butterfly in a small qt and really want him moved....
 
A bit off topic but I'm wanting to transfer my livestock to a new setup too. Does it need a cycle or will my current live rock etc be sufficient? I have a butterfly in a small qt and really want him moved....
The fish I acclimated as if they were just purchased and I used 40% old water and rest new and am adding MicroBacter XLM Dail at 1.5ml per 10 gallons for 2 weeks
 
I find it interesting that people talk about "established" as a point in time, 6 months, 1 year and such. In my mind its more of a continuum, every progressing. Sure, a two year old tank is more mature than 6 months. But my tank at year 12 was vastly different than at year 2.

I think the more new school idea of biome diversity might be a more defined concept of what we have called maturity.
 
I find it interesting that people talk about "established" as a point in time, 6 months, 1 year and such. In my mind its more of a continuum, every progressing. Sure, a two year old tank is more mature than 6 months. But my tank at year 12 was vastly different than at year 2.

I think the more new school idea of biome diversity might be a more defined concept of what we have call maturity.


I think biome diversity is a good hypothesis for algal issues, but I fail to see a reasonable explaination as to how it related to coral health and growth outside of possible predation of microfauna that may be lacking at first. I think the use of x months is just to have a number that new people in the hobby can look to.
 
There was a macna speech where they talked about how corals will try to adjust to each tanks specific parameters (no matter what they are, within reason) to live; this length of time varies obv for countless reasons. The beginner hobbyist may likely be changing those parameters early on and that could make a "young" tank hard to keep corals in but given enough time with stable parameters (even if not in the ideal range) the corals will/can adapt (although perhaps not thrive/live ideally). This pointed me toward stability over age per say...at least that's how I interpreted it :)
 
I think biome diversity is a good hypothesis for algal issues, but I fail to see a reasonable explaination as to how it related to coral health and growth outside of possible predation of microfauna that may be lacking at first. I think the use of x months is just to have a number that new people in the hobby can look to.

I agree that there may not be a direct link. But coral growth is related to stability, and in my experience a more developed and matured biome is a base for stability. My well established tank well shrug off changes that the earlier version of itself would suffer under.
 
I agree that there may not be a direct link. But coral growth is related to stability, and in my experience a more developed and matured biome is a base for stability. My well established tank well shrug off changes that the earlier version of itself would suffer under.


I definitely think it helps with nitrogen and phosphate stability
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top