Review after half a year: I wish I didn't buy it.
1. It's UV channel is dangerous. One time I raised it by 10% at peak, and it burnt half of my tank. It was my bad that I didn't test for PAR when doing the change. Later I did test it, I found that, raising other channel by 10% raise PAR about 20~50 at 6" depth, but raise UV channel from 80% to 90% raise PAR by more than 80. Now I kept that below 70% at peak to be safe.
2. The sexy looking mount is actually very inflexible in practice. Because the angle of the arm is set, rising the light will also push it towards the front of the tank. My tank surface is 30" x 18". In terms of power, it's capable to give full coverage of the whole tank at peak. But that requires it to be mounted at the highest point of the mount. Unfortunately, that position also push it literally on top of the front glass. It's front edge is actually out of the front glass, and the back, where the top of rock is, is very dim. And if it's mounted lower so that it's in the center of the tank in its depth, it will be too close to the water than produce significant hot spot in the top middle of the tank. So now, I mount it at the middle level, put it on about 70% at peak, and have 2 Kessil A160WE, which I happen to have around, to cover two corners. For that setup, I wish I bought a A360WE at its place and it would do a better job and cost less.