- Joined
- Mar 30, 2016
- Messages
- 789
- Reaction score
- 433
Nothing... LOLWhat are you trying to kill with that alk![]()
We are using the calculator...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing... LOLWhat are you trying to kill with that alk![]()
We are using inline pH probes (insertion wells in pipe) not hobby grade pH probes.Are you sure is not bubbles covering the probe? I mean, this is one of the potential causes, right?
I have a diamond gobi so we won't be able to look at substrate changes. He keeps things turned over and clean.
I do have a diatom issue. Have to clean the glass 1-2 times a week or the brown film gets too much. I never have green film algae on the glass. I get some diatoms on my rock. I used to get a ton more when I used biopellets. Got rid of those about a year ago but diatoms continue. Not an issue, just wish they would finally go away.
I feed mostly frozen food and I feed well. Even my diamondback gobi has a fat tummy from eating the frozen food.
My amazon order should be here next week with my limewood airstone and my diaphragm air pump. I'm going to try this thing out so speak up with any requested before and after metrics.
There was a question about volatiles and smells, etc.
There was a number of chemical manufacturing facilities publications that explained how CO2 was forced out of solution by diffusing clean CO2 scrubbed atmospheric air into a water purification system.
The gist was, dissolve (diffuse) as much (CCSAA) clean CO2 scrubbed atmospheric air to saturation to drive off unwanted gases including methane, H2S, and other rancid smelling gases.
The thought around this (I believe) is similar in keeping a computer server room slightly pressurized, through air conditioning, (0.5 to 1.5 inches wc) to prevent dust from being sucked into the room.
So if the aquarium (which can absorb gases from the environment) absorbs CO2 we would be able to "slightly pressurize" the water from being able to absorb the CO2 from the environment by pumping in and infusing the water with fresh atmospheric air.
This infusion of "atmospheric air" via the nanobubbles/microbubbles, forces out any gas out of solution.
A while ago I had a lot of clay in my pond. I tried a lot of things to clear the water, but what ended up working was poly-fill.
As far as I know clay particles are negatively charged (right?), so would that also help to remove nanobubbles from the system?
Thanks.Assuming no organics are bound to the bubbles, the bubbles are negatively charged at reef tank pH (and assuming they behave in seawater as they do in freshwater with a little salt at the same pH).
Different clays will be different, but Bentonite is mostly uncharged at pH 8:
http://www.eeer.org/upload/eer-8-4-222-7.pdf
I was trying to explain it to the people that were following... I'm getting a ton of PM's asking how CO2 is being degassed... not a response to your post, Randy...That explains how bubbles will remove any gas, including those that smell, as I suggested, but not why the tank smells differently when the bubbles are not present. It may be as simple as other masking odors being removed, however, leaving the molecules that folks consider the fresh ocean smell.

Sorry it this has been answered already, but does it have to be a wood airstone as opposed to the white or blue ones you typically see at the LFS? If so what's the reason for only using wood? I would like to try this and have everything laying around except a wood airstone, I have a white one and I think a blue one.

Ok, so the non wood airstones produce bigger bubbles right? Just want to make sure I'm reading that correctly, it's already been a long day lol. If that's the case do you think it would do any harm to use the other airstones until I can find/order a wooden one? Or should I just hold off until then?We are using the limewood airstones because they are relatively cheap and does not require a high pressure pump.
For quick proof of concept and to assist people in trying this five dollar method was the best way to deliver the message that bubble size matters and additional O2 and floatation of detritus is beneficial.
Bubble size is being scrutinized primarily and the other unexpected results from these very tiny bubbles.
Nanos are what we are shooting for... but with the airstone we are calculating that we have maybe 5% nano generation and 95% micro...
![]()
Under non pressurized air source, yes the blue glass sintered air stones produce larger coarser bubbles... If you wanted, place your current coarse airstone in the overflow return (in the sump) to promote more degassing of unwanted gases.Ok, so the non wood airstones produce bigger bubbles right? Just want to make sure I'm reading that correctly, it's already been a long day lol. If that's the case do you think it would do any harm to use the other airstones until I can find/order a wooden one? Or should I just hold off until then?
Calculations are based off of probability.How are you calculating any nanobubbles? From the articles, it appears very difficult to create nanobubbles.
Cruz, I'm not understanding on what basis you conclude that any nano bubbles are created by this method. Do you have any references to papers I can read that show nano bubbles being created by wood airstones and pump impellers?
Please... watch the video... shine a laser through your water horizontally after bubbling... and identify the number of fleck and twinkles of lights you see...Cruz, I'm not understanding on what basis you conclude that any nano bubbles are created by this method. Do you have any references to papers I can read that show nano bubbles being created by wood airstones and pump impellers?
Cb684, I'll be very interested in seeing what happens in your tank when you inject bubbles with that BT-50 under high pressure.

