Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kind of funny/ironic that the closest you found was a simply “blue polyp mystery”From my few minutes of internet searching I can't seem to find an exact match, maybe something like this (though polyps in your picture look to be more green. . . but with differences in lighting it is hard to say):
![]()
Blue Polyp Mystery Montipora
#html-body [data-pb-style=HCL2B6L],#html-body [data-pb-style=QHKLSGU],#html-body [data-pb-style=R20JVKS]{margin:5px}{{widget type="Magento\Cms\Block\Widget\Block" template="widget/static_block/default.phtml" block_id="69" type_name="CMS Static Block"}}<br><br>{{widget...tidalgardens.com
Though as said above it may not have a specific trade name.
Regardless it is a cool looking Monti!
For clarification here, are you looking for the trade name (like Sunset Monti or Season's Greetings Monti) or the scientific name (like Montipora digitata, M. setosa, etc.)?
BothFor clarification here, are you looking for the trade name (like Sunset Monti or Season's Greetings Monti) or the scientific name (like Montipora digitata, M. setosa, etc.)?
Not M. undata; M. undata look more similar to confusa. What we call undata in the hobby are misidentified.Undata
Was looking for a surname not confirmation of species
Montipora is the genus, not the species. What you are thinking of as "subspecies" is species.As far as I know monti species are broken down into sub species rather than just colour like pinky bluey greens orangey montipora
Depends where you look and who said what when, is it even really a Montipora lolNot M. undata; M. undata look more similar to confusa. What we call undata in the hobby are misidentified.
Type specimen of M. undata
Montipora is the genus, not the species. What you are thinking of as "subspecies" is species.
I would guess the species would be something like M. danae. IDK, I'm not well-versed in Acroporid species ID; too many species to remember.
The photo shown is the type specimen, which is what the species is defined on. Most of the photos in CotW do track with being similar to M. confusa. Photo 11 is a misidentification.Depends where you look and who said what when, is it even really a Montipora lol
A type specimen is what a species is based on. The type specimen of Montipora undata looks nothing like what we in the hobby call M. undata. Anybody can call any coral M. undata, but at the end of the day, only corals conforming to the morphology or genetics of said species's type specimen are Montipora undata.

