Need help with your aquascape?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ardeus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None
I despise aquascaping. No matter what I do, I cannot replicate what I built outside and can’t get it to where it doesn’t look like a dang pile of rocks dumped into the tank
 
I don’t think anyone truly understands just how much I hate them ting to create art out of rocks
 
I don’t think anyone truly understands just how much I hate them ting to create art out of rocks

I do I been messing with mine on and off for months. The first scape was my best but couldn’t replicate it.
 
I can’t get it to look even remotely nice. It just looks like someone dumped a bucket of rocks in there.

Not to mention 14” is a pain the butt to work with. I have no room to give depth. It almost HAS to go straight up
 
We have an aquascape!


842efb4e96c01a5e10bea384ff9465d4.jpg

I like that a lot better. Only think to mention further is make sure you leave room between the rock and glass for cleaning and flow. I usually aim for 2” of space, but enough to fit a scraper through is fine if you have a tight fit.
 
Coming from someone that can’t get his right.
I would break up some of the large rock. Start with the biggest one and play. Being such shallow depth I think it may help.

My tank depth is 23” and I found the big rock take up a lot of room and look like big piles. It help me

Your scape isn’t all that bad by the way.
Walk away and look at it tomorrow with a fresh mind
 
I am a stubborn SOB. There is a sh*tton of coral placement. The build on the left at the top will be getting in excess of 400 PAR. The island on the right will be getting 230-250.

At 12” over water this light puts out a ton of PAR. The island are sturdy. I gave it a really good shake. Now any tweaking? Let me have it.

9c21b5aea688b2873643e6235866650d.jpg
 
I am a stubborn SOB. There is a sh*tton of coral placement. The build on the left at the top will be getting in excess of 400 PAR. The island on the right will be getting 230-250.

At 12” over water this light puts out a ton of PAR. The island are sturdy. I gave it a really good shake. Now any tweaking? Let me have it.

9c21b5aea688b2873643e6235866650d.jpg


There’s nothing wrong with your scape, but here are my comments:

Pile on the left is very vertical and will limit coral placement. I like a bit of a slope front-to-back.

Personally, I like my rockwork to look like one structure rather than a pile of rocks. I achieve this by epoxying small pieces of rock into the cracks between big rocks. It’s a lot of work, but helps secure the pile too.
 
There’s nothing wrong with your scape, but here are my comments:

Pile on the left is very vertical and will limit coral placement. I like a bit of a slope front-to-back.

Personally, I like my rockwork to look like one structure rather than a pile of rocks. I achieve this by epoxying small pieces of rock into the cracks between big rocks. It’s a lot of work, but helps secure the pile too.

I can’t really go any further back because I will lose rock area to put corals in due to the coast to give internal overflow box (will crest a massive shaded area that really blocks light). I have about 14” to work with. I have almost no choice but to go vertical.

That said, I am not someone who enjoys putting puzzles together or creating art. I have been placing rubble in the seams.
 
Here are some other views.

525547af8a4224fd71ef20487c7b6889.jpg


You can see the overflow box and it’s about 12” from overflow box to the front glass.


f879a6ed3d597078d070ff9ac72abc4c.jpg


There are a million things I would do differently and the internal box would be the first on the list.
 
Unless I say screw it and don’t use the back section of the rock for anything. That would give me more options but just seems like a waste of rock surface area
 
Unless I say screw it and don’t use the back section of the rock for anything. That would give me more options but just seems like a waste of rock surface area

I think that’s your answer. You won’t be able to see the back anyway. Use the space to create a gentler slope int the front. Just don’t lean it on the back glass....since you’ll want to get flow back there. You could probably go a little shorter too. I prefer my rocks to not exceed half of tank height by much.

Don’t get me wrong. Your scape is perfectly fine. These are just my preferences in what I think makes a good looking tank.
 
I think that’s your answer. You won’t be able to see the back anyway. Use the space to create a gentler slope int the front. Just don’t lean it on the back glass....since you’ll want to get flow back there. You could probably go a little shorter too. I prefer my rocks to not exceed half of tank height by much.

Don’t get me wrong. Your scape is perfectly fine. These are just my preferences in what I think makes a good looking tank.

I don't really have enough room to do an arch, so would I be better off building an island about 8-10" higher than the one on the right? create caves and nooks inside that?

This is where I really struggle, there are thumbtacks with more creativity than me.
 
Don't commit to use all the rock you have. When it looks good, stop adding rock. Start with the bigger pieces.

I also agree with Sawdonkey, create a slope from back to front and lean the top rocks against the back pane.
 
Don't commit to use all the rock you have. When it looks good, stop adding rock. Start with the bigger pieces.

I also agree with Sawdonkey, create a slope from back to front and lean the top rocks against the back pane.

will work on it tonight. I want room between the back wall and the rocks though don't i?

18" is next to impossible to work with, moreso if you have an internal coast to coast overflow.
 
If you leave about an inch of space on the bottom rocks and lean the top rocks to the back pane it's enough for water to flow and fish to pass.
 
im gonna be setting up a waterbox 100.3 very soon and been playing with rock structures Im pretty happy with I have so far ill post them here also to get some feedback on it. I have 3 revisions so far that are basically the same except the top section of the right structure. The tank is 36x24x22 gonna be a mixed reef sps top half and lps lower half. Any suggestions will be great and which of 3 do you like better or what would you change. Scape 2 and 3 are the same other than a spacer rock to make the top taller shorter.

aquascape 1
559395e281dfc23659978856094fc1e5.jpg
e3485f13002dd6fa2f18af34eb562b2d.jpg
a616f044c76ad099fd3a354e8f7d8d8f.jpg
e3169b505182700fe888bd97f02a4016.jpg
5cc8e5aaf48d5138c27fa6c0154c0253.jpg

aquascape 2
c7679065b2866684333ea7bcfc035c09.jpg
b021c28f4001df68fb51aea104782402.jpg
e2453ad56c58d950e4bf3f896256bac7.jpg

aquascape 3
cf7d3a8dc93fb8ce78763200a054f1ba.jpg
6c283498b0fa7308147a017252770f5d.jpg
3a0f265c1885360e5f697d97ff0cd48b.jpg
 
Last edited:
If you leave about an inch of space on the bottom rocks and lean the top rocks to the back pane it's enough for water to flow and fish to pass.

i just watched the rectangle aquascape video (no idea how i didn't see that before) on page 1. It's going to be more of a rockwall, but maybe we can angle some rocks to create depth. I may take 2 rocks from the island on the right to incorporate into the left structure, and move it forward since the bigger one will be further back.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top