Telegram was surmising that the gen 1 panel was re-machined.Coralcare gen 1 uses 2 subpanels. The internal panel screw holes do not match.
![]()
![]()
Please provide evidence. Include both COGS and distributor fees.
Spread has never been the question. A Kessil also has similar spread. Actual tank coverage with auqascape and corals is the question.
Please provide a source. Otherwise we could make a rumor that "The diffuser was a collaboration between Neptune and Philips."
There may be a good engineering reason for this. Reactivity of saltwater and thermal paste? Macro vs Micro structural effects dominating the thermal conduction? Effect on the paste as it dries and the pieces move? The thermal load could also be so low that it does not matter. This is not the same as a CPU with a high point load, rigid structure and small size. Good question for Neptune.
They blow down through 4 slots on the edge of the fixture. There is no conclusive evidence that this raises or lowers the tank temperature.
Regardless, send Neptune a bill, and I think you should watch BRS's video talking about the quality of Chinese black box LED fixtures and then re-examine the SKY and realize it's "license plate" led panel is 50% thinner aluminum, has less of heat sink, and no thermal paste... name brand LEDs the Sky does have, i will give it that--and very nice software everyone seems to agree on.
My overall point is that the "control freaks" at Neptune turn a lot of people off by trying control the message about Skys more than any other manufacturer about any other product. They make unsupportable exaggerated claims. They copy other's products. Which is basically fine--except when they claim they're doing something unique.






