If one does give advice without warning for the possible caveats created by following that advice ,, then I will react with a warning . If it takes 20 pages it means the issue is alive.
You try to make a point of view by reacting on my previous interception, which means you have a reason to do so. Nobody has stopped you to add a valid reason. And like it or not, a skimmer does play a very imported role in the availability of organic carbon and other essential nutrient and the production of safely stored but usable nitrogen, nitrate.
Talking in discussions about nutrient management , one may not ignore the reasons why one does not agree.
Where are the interests of people reacting on posts? In preventing the disease or in treating the disease? Or just to defend the way one has taken and promoted over a long period op time without taking in account possible side effects, even when many years ago it has been shown to be a dangerous road to follow with many major issues . A road without a final destination. A road which starts where it ends. Maybe one has build his business on that road ? And then one may rightly wonder whether it is a good way to follow, taking the family on a dangerous journey without final destination. Certainly with the knowledge this dangerous road is avoidable in the first place.
If one does not react on this post, it will certainly not take 20 pages to explain how and why,
If one does respond then hopefully with a valid reason.
I will not react any more with explaining how and why,
information about dosing carbohydrates, including vinegar, and about basic C/N management has been posted and is available.
I will continue to react on posts concerning dosing carbohydrates based on the nitrate level because it has been proven to have many major side effects and besides killing and bleaching corals, overdosing may lead to a very dangerous situation, loosing 2 of the 3 pillars supporting the carrying capacity. Dosing carbohydrates based on the nitrate level does NOT prevent overdosing.