Peppermint angel $30,000

gmoney243 · May 23, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKJ8EKxlaJQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Sent from my Vortex using Tapatalk 2

fsu1dolfan · May 23, 2012

Nice looking angel but $30,000...that's crazy!

REEFKEEPER10 · May 23, 2012

I would sell my wife to own one but wouldn't want to give that headache to anyone. Lol

revhtree · May 23, 2012

That's crazy!

MattL22 · May 23, 2012

That's a real nice fish!! If I was a millionaire I'd grab one!

p woodard · May 23, 2012

The wife told me I can get a loan on the house to get one lol

ToXIc · May 23, 2012

I hope the other angel doesn't stress it to death.

____________________________
Sent from my iThingy using Tapatalk

Reefer5060 · May 23, 2012

Even if I was a millionaire spending that kind of money on one fish .... Idk I could buy so many chromis with $30000

jonbar1 · May 23, 2012

I think I'd save my money for a Chili Red Arowana...even though the one I want could buy a nice house. To each their own.

REEFKEEPER10 · May 24, 2012

For that kind of money I would knock out the walls of my bedroom and replace it them with one big tank all the way around. Well I would need the outer wall and doors. Lol

saltwaternoob · May 24, 2012

Wow nice fish but not worth the money no matter how rich you are.

H@rry · May 24, 2012

I caught one of those in the Tennessee River last week on a piece of hot dog weenie. :fish2: I thought it was some kind of bream and threw it back.

gmoney243 · May 24, 2012

I'm pretty sure for $30k I could get someone with a sub to go deepwater and collect buncha other rare fish instead lol. Anyone watch Fish Tank Kings?

Really the angel is worth more since $30k was turned down lol. Its the only captive one in the world. If I had bill gates money I'm sure that would be my Chromis lol id have a school of $30k fish

Sent from my Vortex using Tapatalk 2

EvilMel · May 24, 2012

Even if I had all the money in the world, I could not justify spending that on a fish. That's ridiculous.

ToXIc · May 24, 2012

If you had all the money in the world. That would be pocket change.

____________________________
Sent from my iThingy using Tapatalk

EvilMel · May 24, 2012

...and that much money could feed a lot of people therefore I would not be able to justify spending it on a fish.

Dowtish · May 24, 2012

if you had all the actual existing currency, as opposed to what is just a loan on paper, you probably wouldnt have as much as you think,(but thats a whole nother subject.) but you would have a lot more to be dealing with then worrying about a fish for your tank. you would be worrying about how to make the planet survive, since no one else has any money. And would money really be worth anything if you were the only one to possess it? You would have to start paying someone before it had any monetary value....:blah:

gmoney243 · May 24, 2012

I think you took what mel said a little to serious lol. Funny tho how there are people with enough money to change things if they wanted. But none seem to really want to. They donate a mill or two here and there to make themselves feel better and to make people think they are good people.

Sent from my Vortex using Tapatalk 2