- Joined
- Jul 27, 2016
- Messages
- 554
- Reaction score
- 254
I am having a bit of a conundrum about what PO4 removal media to use. My tanks are pretty heavily stocked, so I find myself changing my media on a fairly regular basis.
My Triton ICP results have a number of flags coming up that identify my GFO media as a potential source of contamination. Primarily: Silicon, Barium and Aluminum. They suggest using the Triton AL99, RowaPhos or Phosban media. I currently use BRS High Capacity.
Has anyone compared cost and performance of these different medias? I've only used standard BRS GFO and BRS HC GFO (which generally costs twice as much but requires half as much). Honestly, I haven't heard anything good about the Triton AL99 media, so probably won't even bother with that unless someone can provide compelling data to prove the reviews wrong.
From the looks of things, Rowa and Phosban look expensive, but I don't really know if they'll last me twice as long, or require use of less media. I'd appreciate any insights before I dump a bunch of cash on testing different PO4 removal medias.
Thanks!
My Triton ICP results have a number of flags coming up that identify my GFO media as a potential source of contamination. Primarily: Silicon, Barium and Aluminum. They suggest using the Triton AL99, RowaPhos or Phosban media. I currently use BRS High Capacity.
Has anyone compared cost and performance of these different medias? I've only used standard BRS GFO and BRS HC GFO (which generally costs twice as much but requires half as much). Honestly, I haven't heard anything good about the Triton AL99 media, so probably won't even bother with that unless someone can provide compelling data to prove the reviews wrong.
From the looks of things, Rowa and Phosban look expensive, but I don't really know if they'll last me twice as long, or require use of less media. I'd appreciate any insights before I dump a bunch of cash on testing different PO4 removal medias.
Thanks!


