Pukani rock or Marco rock

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Nht

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
250
Reaction score
64
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Starting up a new 130 soon. Can’t decide on which rock so open to suggestions. Which one do you guys like better and why? Which one in your experiences have better shapes? Pics are greatly appreciated.
 
I've never used either. I've heard pukani has to be cured for a while to prevent phosphate leaching. I'd also read similar about marco and that it also tends to crumble(?) Could be confusing it with something else.

Alternatively, if you're set on dried, you could order from John at @reefcleaners . I've always been pleased with the rock he sent me(several orders). He also sells clean up crews and some macro algae.
 
Marco rock is heavy and not as pourious as Pukani. Pukani is easy to chip and break apart to create just the right sizes and shapes. Just seems easier to work with.

xGVJBJ9h.jpg
 
Thanks for the replies. Which rock has better shapes and holes to stick frag plugs in? So does Marco rock less likely to leach phosphates and other nasties?
 
I have Marco. It's pretty good rock. Does not crumble but is on the brittle side. Easy to make frag plug holes. Marco shelf rock looks good. I have the single and flat cuts which make a very stable base.
I think pukani is better overall but it requires curing since it has alot of dead critters in it.
 
Anyone used rocks from reefrocks.net? They claim to pre clean their rocks so there’s no fear of phosphates and nasties leaching
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top