Radion Channel PAR Measurements

FunkEngine

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
85
Reaction score
37
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Perhaps an odd request, but would someone with a Radion and a PAR meter be able to measure the relative PAR values for each individual channel when on the AB+ program? I don't have access to a spectrometer to tune my DIY lights, but I figure I should be able to get within the ballpark by approximating with the PAR values for individual color channels.
 
I would love to test this. Maybe if I can convince ecotech to let me carry their product line. :D
 
Perhaps an odd request, but would someone with a Radion and a PAR meter be able to measure the relative PAR values for each individual channel when on the AB+ program? I don't have access to a spectrometer to tune my DIY lights, but I figure I should be able to get within the ballpark by approximating with the PAR values for individual color channels.
You would have to match the spectral qualities of both lights closely for this data to be valid.

A simple lux meter would get just as close if you just want to set the light assuming you did your best to match the frequencies.

In fact someone with a lux meter and a Radion would likely be able to give you similar data.
 
You would have to match the spectral qualities of both lights closely for this data to be valid.

A simple lux meter would get just as close if you just want to set the light assuming you did your best to match the frequencies.

In fact someone with a lux meter and a Radion would likely be able to give you similar data.

I went with PAR as its numbers more people would be able to get for their lights or know about their light. I also understand that it would not allow you to exactly match the spectrum. That's not exactly the point here, its more so to give a ballpark reference for a "known good" spectrum when setting either DIY or other lights that do not offer spectral suggestions. In this case if everyone had a spectrometer it would be much more simple to set lights consistently well, but as far as I know almost no one has spectrometers or even access to them. By contrast while most do not own a PAR meter, many more will have access to one through local clubs. Its not an ideal solution, but I think it would be usable to get one close-ish to a good spectrum.
 
I went with PAR as its numbers more people would be able to get for their lights or know about their light. I also understand that it would not allow you to exactly match the spectrum. That's not exactly the point here, its more so to give a ballpark reference for a "known good" spectrum when setting either DIY or other lights that do not offer spectral suggestions. In this case if everyone had a spectrometer it would be much more simple to set lights consistently well, but as far as I know almost no one has spectrometers or even access to them. By contrast while most do not own a PAR meter, many more will have access to one through local clubs. Its not an ideal solution, but I think it would be usable to get one close-ish to a good spectrum.
When putting together diy lights , many sites offer guides to assist one one in selecting leds to cover the desired spectrum and native color temperate. There are a few calulators that will help determine 'this too. (One here might help https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/great-led-color-spectrum-calculator.230899/#post-2686855)

If you're interested there are actually several low cost spectrometers available as well as color tempratue meters. One for the phone here.
http://nofilmschool.com/2015/04/your-iphone-now-professional-light-color-meter-cine-meter-ii-update
I belive there are a few other ones now available as well like these on a phone
http://www.wired.co.uk/article/camera-phone-spectrometer

Also a simple prisim can be used.

Hmmm. #reefsquad any one with a Radion and a par/lux meter wanna experiment?
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top