Radium ballast

childress5tyler

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
809
Reaction score
67
Location
Fairland, IN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I run 2 250 watt radiums on PFO ballasts and I'm considering switching to galaxy or vertex ballasts because of the size and noise that the PFO ballasts put out. Would this be a recommended switch or should I suck it up and stay with my pfos
 
I ran mine on galaxies with no problem. I have 2 for sale by the way.
 
2 years old, both cords and boxes $150 plus shipping excellent condition
 
Just keep in mind that the radium 250w bulb was meant to be driven by a PFO magnetic ballast. You can run them on a Galaxy or Lumatek electronic ballast, but it will slightly overdrive the bulb and potentially reduce lifespan and/or change the light color. I ran the 250w radiums on Lumateks for a few years without issues. Typically replaced bulbs every 7-9 months.
 
I never measured the PAR, but saw no difference in growth or bulb color after 10 months. Some folks go 12 months before changing. I'm seriously comsidering a PAR meter for this type of data, especially since I now run 3x400w radiums over a 210g. I'd like to compare PAR after 6 months. The trouble is we don't only care about PAR from our light sources, we also want to have the correct light spectrum. There are studies that indicate light spectrum changes on "older" bulbs.
 
I personally would keep them running on the PFOs as well. I have ran 250w radium's on galaxy's in the past for a few years after my PFO died, but prefered the look of the PFO ballasts. Ran 3 400w radiums with PFOs for years on a 300g sps tank. As Matt888 said, the radiums were ment to be run on magnetic ballasts. The pfo ballast and radiums were ment for each other :)
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top