- Joined
- Jul 26, 2019
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 19
- Location
- Chandler, AZ
- What state or country do you live in
- Arizona
Hi everyone… First post, though I've been lurking for a while. I have learned a lot from reading everyone else's posts, and hope to be able to contribute someday!
I am about to begin a Reefer 350 build, and I am planning to hard plumb everything. One of the comments that has been made repeatedly about the V3 sump is that the layout is inconvenient if you are planning a manifold.
My question is this - I think one thing that would help would be swapping the location of the return pipe (which is on the left in the weir) and the drainpipe which is on the right. This would allow a straighter connection to the return pump with fewer elbows, and still allow the stock ATO to remain in place for use as an ATO or refugium. The main complication is the return output in the box, which could be extended to connect to the relocated return pipe inside the box.
Does anyone see an issue with this idea?
Thanks...excited to get started and begin my own build thread!
---Lee
I am about to begin a Reefer 350 build, and I am planning to hard plumb everything. One of the comments that has been made repeatedly about the V3 sump is that the layout is inconvenient if you are planning a manifold.
My question is this - I think one thing that would help would be swapping the location of the return pipe (which is on the left in the weir) and the drainpipe which is on the right. This would allow a straighter connection to the return pump with fewer elbows, and still allow the stock ATO to remain in place for use as an ATO or refugium. The main complication is the return output in the box, which could be extended to connect to the relocated return pipe inside the box.
Does anyone see an issue with this idea?
Thanks...excited to get started and begin my own build thread!
---Lee

