- Joined
- Jul 10, 2018
- Messages
- 554
- Reaction score
- 255
- What state or country do you live in
- New York
I'm building a manifold for my Red Sea Reefer 170. The manifold will be used to 1) input and control flow into the ATO which will be turned into a refugium 2) possibly power a reactor for carbon/gfo.
With space limited due to the small footprint of the tank, I did my best to use space efficiently while making sure the weight of the plumbing is supported. Which of the following options works best in your opinion or should I go about this an entirely different way?
A. I am using only 1 valve for the ATO fuge. I'd run a reactor on it's own pump. I would hard plumb all the way straight down. Benefit is more space in stand but I may need to run a second pump for the reactor. This is the most simple option .
B. Both valves going across. Return pump soft plumbed. Back valve is accessible even though picture makes it seem like it isn't. Only concern is the weight of plumbing is not supported.
C. Probably my favorite option along with option A. I would be able to run a reactor off my return pump. I can also support the weight of the PVC with clamps up top unlike options B and D. The only possible negatives are 1) The extra 90s which I'm not sure if that even matters 2) The barb for the hose from the return pump to hard plumb is a little farther but I don't know if that matters either.
D. This is like option B but plumbing is going front to back rather than side to side. Same concern - not sure if weight of plumbing will be an issue.
With space limited due to the small footprint of the tank, I did my best to use space efficiently while making sure the weight of the plumbing is supported. Which of the following options works best in your opinion or should I go about this an entirely different way?
A. I am using only 1 valve for the ATO fuge. I'd run a reactor on it's own pump. I would hard plumb all the way straight down. Benefit is more space in stand but I may need to run a second pump for the reactor. This is the most simple option .
B. Both valves going across. Return pump soft plumbed. Back valve is accessible even though picture makes it seem like it isn't. Only concern is the weight of plumbing is not supported.
C. Probably my favorite option along with option A. I would be able to run a reactor off my return pump. I can also support the weight of the PVC with clamps up top unlike options B and D. The only possible negatives are 1) The extra 90s which I'm not sure if that even matters 2) The barb for the hose from the return pump to hard plumb is a little farther but I don't know if that matters either.
D. This is like option B but plumbing is going front to back rather than side to side. Same concern - not sure if weight of plumbing will be an issue.







