Hello everyone!!
I have a question for the forum, I am following a few threads about filter socks (which I use) and the constant debate is wroth the hassle or not?! Well this is NOT that thread.
I am interested in anyone using a sediment/debris trap in their sump, what is your set up and pros/cons. Here is what I think of when I say sediment/debris trap. There is a guy local to me who has a 300 gallon tank, it flows into his basement into a 40 gallon breeder. He originally took the breeder apart and drilled in, then put it back together with the BOTTOM pane having one 2in hole with a bulkhead installed. Then one of the side panes has 2 additional bulkheads installed with drain lines in them. They drain to his 150 gallon stock tank which houses skimmer etc. No socks anywhere. So water enters one side of the 40 gallon and exits the other. So when he does water changes what he does is reroute his drains from the 40 gallon to the 150 gallon sump via valves. Then he stirs up all the water in the 40 gallon and opens the bulkhead on the bottom of the drain and it drains into a floor drain. The reason for stirring it up is the 40 gallon is used to collect debris as a settlement zone. Then he closes the valve on the bottom bulkhead, opens the valves on the drain lines to run them back into the 40 gallon debris trap and he then adds 40 gallons of new saltwater via his water change tub.
Never has to stop any pumps or anything. Using the 40 gallon to collect the debris eliminates the need for socks or filter pads. Now I know, sure some debris escapes this method, but it escapes all methods!
Any one else do anything similar to this? I think it is a brilliant idea and if I didn't live in a 1 level apartment and space I would do something just like it.
I have read on here somewhere, I think a guy does something very similar with a 5 gallon bucket setting in his sump. It is drilled with a few holes to let the water escape. I seem to recall him using filter pads too, probably due to the small size of the bucket in comparison to the turbulent zone inside the bucket. The pads probably help keep some of the debris in the bucket.
Anyone do anything similar to this and how do you like it? Pictures?
Thank you
corey
I have a question for the forum, I am following a few threads about filter socks (which I use) and the constant debate is wroth the hassle or not?! Well this is NOT that thread.
I am interested in anyone using a sediment/debris trap in their sump, what is your set up and pros/cons. Here is what I think of when I say sediment/debris trap. There is a guy local to me who has a 300 gallon tank, it flows into his basement into a 40 gallon breeder. He originally took the breeder apart and drilled in, then put it back together with the BOTTOM pane having one 2in hole with a bulkhead installed. Then one of the side panes has 2 additional bulkheads installed with drain lines in them. They drain to his 150 gallon stock tank which houses skimmer etc. No socks anywhere. So water enters one side of the 40 gallon and exits the other. So when he does water changes what he does is reroute his drains from the 40 gallon to the 150 gallon sump via valves. Then he stirs up all the water in the 40 gallon and opens the bulkhead on the bottom of the drain and it drains into a floor drain. The reason for stirring it up is the 40 gallon is used to collect debris as a settlement zone. Then he closes the valve on the bottom bulkhead, opens the valves on the drain lines to run them back into the 40 gallon debris trap and he then adds 40 gallons of new saltwater via his water change tub.
Never has to stop any pumps or anything. Using the 40 gallon to collect the debris eliminates the need for socks or filter pads. Now I know, sure some debris escapes this method, but it escapes all methods!
Any one else do anything similar to this? I think it is a brilliant idea and if I didn't live in a 1 level apartment and space I would do something just like it.
I have read on here somewhere, I think a guy does something very similar with a 5 gallon bucket setting in his sump. It is drilled with a few holes to let the water escape. I seem to recall him using filter pads too, probably due to the small size of the bucket in comparison to the turbulent zone inside the bucket. The pads probably help keep some of the debris in the bucket.
Anyone do anything similar to this and how do you like it? Pictures?
Thank you
corey


