Seneye Par accuracy

Beats001

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 12, 2018
Messages
156
Reaction score
55
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi, I got a Seneye reef, which has the PAR meter. I am interested in peoples experiences of this PAR meter and how it compares to other PAR meters.
Does it measure higher or lower?
Are there any gotchas when using the meter?
Thanks
 
Slightly lower higher up close to the light. It has a slightly narrower field of view so to speak.
But a good meter
 
It all depends on you. If you can get it exactly 90 degrees from the light source on, it can do pretty well. If not, then it can be WAY off. IMO, I would probably enjoy it I had it for other reasons and just dabbled around with the PAR meter, but I would never buy it over an Apogee just specifically to measure PAR.

BRS did a good job of using it. You can browse the first 5-10 pages of posts on this board and find people who have struggled with it. The issue with it is that the sensor is not cosine corrected.
 
Yeah I seen the BRS video, and I don't expect it to be perfect. Good tips on measuring. I think the stick i am using to hold the meter isn't great its hard to get an angle with it. I have a cable tie holding it on too. Not sure if this could be affecting it. Any one have tips on a decent holder? Also do you guys turn your flow off? I don't, I figured you should measure based on you normal tank conditions, but keen to get feedback on that too.
 
How are you liking the seneye? I have to get something to replace my junky apex and are looking into everything and not make the same waste of money and time like the apex.
 
It is a decent tool. It is affordable. It gives numbers and I've found it worked well. Based on all of the tests I've watched videos on or read various threads the general consensus is that it actually does a great job. That is why I purchased it. It gives me an idea of what my DIY lighting is doing and that is all I wanted.
 
I borrowed an apogee from my LFS and the seneye measured high, especially closer to the light source.

I think this may be because of the more focussed light closer up the typical LED.

The error was around 20% increasing a lot the closer you got to the illumination source.

If you are not doing this for a living the seneye is close enough, if your reputation depends on it, I'd spend the bucks on something designed for the job.

The seneye will do the job in a pinch, but your business model is designed around fish tanks, why penny pinch.
 
I borrowed an apogee from my LFS and the seneye measured high, especially closer to the light source.

I think this may be because of the more focussed light closer up the typical LED.

The error was around 20% increasing a lot the closer you got to the illumination source.

If you are not doing this for a living the seneye is close enough, if your reputation depends on it, I'd spend the bucks on something designed for the job.

The seneye will do the job in a pinch, but your business model is designed around fish tanks, why penny pinch.

Which Apogee? there are some models that do not read led well and would read low and you need a correction factor.
 
Which Apogee? there are some models that do not read led well and would read low and you need a correction factor.

Apogee 510
IMG_2181.PNG
IMG_2182.PNG
IMG_2184.jpg
IMG_2186.jpg
which I believe does not need a correction factor.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top