Side By Side Red Sea KH Test

NS Mike D

In the arena.
View Badges
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
2,266
Reaction score
4,799
Location
Huntington. NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Have you ever done a back to back test to see the variance in your reading a test kit? I know I struggle reading this test kits and try to keep my own bias out of it but man is that hard.

I was low on my Red Sea KH test which expired as per the label three weeks ago. So the new bottle of reagent arrived today so for fun I did two tests.

Here we go!

IMG_9465.jpg



IMG_7862 2.jpg



The exp 3/20 reagent

for reference it starts blue as expected



IMG_4253.jpg


At Green just about 7.0 dosed. =. 3.6 Meg/l. 9.8 dkh

IMG_9059.jpg



and dumped the rest to illustrate yellow


IMG_6457.jpg



The new test
starts out blue



IMG_6315.jpg




7.2 used, 3.6 Meq/l 10.1 dkh

IMG_7130.jpg



A little over shoot to confirm yellow



IMG_2367.jpg





A few observations

1. The green seems to back slide to blue, After I took the picture of the first sample, I had second thoughts and added a few drops, and it appeared to be anywhere between 9.8 and 11.2 dkh. (see 3rd point) The second test could have easily been read as 3.0 Meq/l 9.8 dkh before I decided to add one more drop.

2. There was a slight difference between the vials on the white sheet and holding them up to daylight (window light). There was a bit more blue hue on the paper, and more yellow hue to the window in both samples

3. The syringe plays a HUGE role. The older syringe numbers were a little faded but more importantly original syringes stick making it hard to add reagent one drop at a time. This has been the case for as long as I can remember. It was particularly problematic when I decided to add more reagent to confirm I was at green and not blue green. Instead drop by drop, it blasted another .1ml. It turned the vial green/yellow and so there as no way of knowing where that occurred The syringe that came with the refill today was clearly more smooth and I was able to add reagent more precisely - drop by drop.


Order syringes and keep them on hand. If a new syringe isn't smooth, throw it out and replace syringes as needed. It makes a difference .



Aside from my syringe issue, Red Sea did improve the way the reagents read ,but it still is by no means a precise line in the sand,
 
I disagree. I would rather use a good quality test kit than a Hannah any day of the week. I like salifert for most things, and love the new Aquaforest Ca test kit. They are easy to read, give very repeatable results if the procedure is followed, and you don't have to mess with those stupid powdered reagent sachets.

I have a hack for the syringes in test kits. I put a piece of transparent scotch tape over the printed side when they are brand new. Prevents the numbers and marks from scuffing off. Works like a charm.
 
old school ...TETRA KH...30 yrs tried em all ,just my 2 cents.. :)
 
I disagree. I would rather use a good quality test kit than a Hannah any day of the week. I like salifert for most things, and love the new Aquaforest Ca test kit. They are easy to read, give very repeatable results if the procedure is followed, and you don't have to mess with those stupid powdered reagent sachets.

I have a hack for the syringes in test kits. I put a piece of transparent scotch tape over the printed side when they are brand new. Prevents the numbers and marks from scuffing off. Works like a charm.
Umm you do realize Hanna is the gold standard in ALK tests? What could be easier then 10ml of tank water, put in hanna, pull out, put in 1ml syringe of reagent, put back in hanna wait for number? No color matching, no reading how much reagent left in the syringe, no "is that blue, or yellow?"

I don't know what hanna your using, but I have never had to open a packet and dump powder. The phsphorus test uses a packet of reagent, but were not talking about that one here.
 
Umm you do realize Hanna is the gold standard in ALK tests? What could be easier then 10ml of tank water, put in hanna, pull out, put in 1ml syringe of reagent, put back in hanna wait for number? No color matching, no reading how much reagent left in the syringe, no "is that blue, or yellow?"

I don't know what hanna your using, but I have never had to open a packet and dump powder. The phsphorus test uses a packet of reagent, but were not talking about that one here.
There has been quite a few threads on this very subject, with people on both sides of the fence. You can argue that the hanna has to process the color, just like the human eye does. Any smudge or scratch on the vial can affect that reading, where it wouldn't using your eyes. Is it easier.....yes. Is it more accurate, I am not sure. I have had a lot of variances in back to back readings using the Hanna ALK. Do I still use it.....yes :-)
 
I have a hack for the syringes in test kits. I put a piece of transparent scotch tape over the printed side when they are brand new. Prevents the numbers and marks from scuffing off. Works like a charm.

good tip

I had 50 syringes $8.89 arrive this week, so I'm set for a while. if one starts to fade or the plunger doesn't slide easily, just pull out a new one.

also had 5 10ml syringes arrive as well for $6.99
 
Just a heads-up - if anyone needs syringes and doesn't want to wait - if you've got a Tractor Supply nearby - they sell syringes. Mine carries 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20ml IIRC.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top