delete
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone else remove their skimmer and notice major improvements in the coral growth and color? Have to wonder if there is any value to sucking the “coral food amino acids” out of the aquarium.
I think the biggest benefit and often overlooked is simply aeration and degassing while remove nutrients is more of a negative side effect.Skimmers are helpful on systems but yes they do take nutrients out the water. I run a skimmer a little bit under rated for my tanks with large refuges.
Did you replace the aeration? Just wondering if there would be any benefit of running airstone in your sump instead.
Are you testing NO3/PO4? That'd be a good step towards determining if you're skimming too heavily. You can skim drier and pull out less if you want.
Also, there are a number of reefs out there running without skimmers.
but I want my corals to have more amino acids available instead of just NO3 and PO4
Corals in general? im sure that some of the millions of species certainly can. Some even take up large particulate like rhodactis, most LPS and so on which means they are most certainly capable of processing amino acids. Even sps will consume small pellets as well as zoas.Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe @Randy Holmes-Farley has stated on many occasions that there is no clear evidence that corals actually can process amino acids from your water, whereas they actively uptake NO3 and PO4 to produce tissue.
Corals in general? im sure that some of the millions of species certainly can. Some even take up large particulate like rhodactis, most LPS and so on which means they are most certainly capable of processing amino acids. Even sps will consume small pellets as well as zoas.
It would seem to make sense that if coral can pull out microscopic particulate then they could probably also pull out amino acids but to be honest I never researched that nor really cared to. However a skimmer will also pull out micro particulate like pods or other broadcast food so its already a problem. I do broadcast reefroids and other micro particulate very often.Pulling particle food out of the water with their polyps are one thing, processing liquid amino acids out of the water are another.
Pulling particle food out of the water with their polyps are one thing, processing liquid amino acids out of the water are another.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe @Randy Holmes-Farley has stated on many occasions that there is no clear evidence that corals actually can process amino acids from your water, whereas they actively uptake NO3 and PO4 to produce tissue.

It's not the specifically the skimmer imo, like any form of nutrient management it's a balance. You likely just needed more "gunk" in your tank. You can probably add more fish and put it back online if you want to maintain the other benefits of running a skimmer, like aeration and the removal of harmful substances.Anyone else remove their skimmer and notice major improvements in the coral growth and color? Have to wonder if there is any value to sucking the “coral food amino acids” out of the aquarium.
Yes this is overlooked. Its great for o2 exchangeI think the biggest benefit and often overlooked is simply aeration and degassing while remove nutrients is more of a negative side effect.
This some what true. I've ran tanks with large fuges with somewhat to low frequent water changes. (med stock tanks) Great growth and color. I prefer a skimmer for exchange of c02 and 02From my research across this and other forums, running without a skimmer seems to require more frequent water changes.
Yes this is overlooked. Its great for o2 exchange
This some what true. I've ran tanks with large fuges with somewhat to low frequent water changes. (med stock tanks) Great growth and color. I prefer a skimmer for exchange of c02 and 02

