dude thats nut's!Here's a small tabular form reef from back in the day
all apologies for the brown sps we were just out of the nineties and it was uncut ground lol.
Smallest SPS Dominated Reef Tank
- Thread starter revhtree
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
- Messages
- 30,220
- Reaction score
- 24,063
- Location
- tejas
- What state or country do you live in
- Alaska
Thanks man
the controversial part - feesh
So hopefully it's clear that yes on any normal planet one shouldn't keep marine fish in a half gallon. On every planet
But
This was a rule breaking tank already... it didn't take topoff, was sealed when the lid was on and the refugium pumped the oxygen, and it was sps where sps shouldn't grow but did... So the right fish was the panda goby
It was happy and fed well on bs
Tiny... Sixty body lengths in the tank plus you know these aren't pelagic swimmers like tangs an sps branch was fine considering good water params in place and they were
The system did not require freshwater topoff and never strayed from .023 given good sealing which had to be re kalked time to time
If anyone can locate any earlier reference showing any size reef aquarium containing thriving scleractinian corals that did not evaporate at all, no topoff ever, ill paypal you fifty bucks. I think that above is the first sealed reef tank.
the controversial part - feesh
So hopefully it's clear that yes on any normal planet one shouldn't keep marine fish in a half gallon. On every planet
But
This was a rule breaking tank already... it didn't take topoff, was sealed when the lid was on and the refugium pumped the oxygen, and it was sps where sps shouldn't grow but did... So the right fish was the panda goby
It was happy and fed well on bs
Tiny... Sixty body lengths in the tank plus you know these aren't pelagic swimmers like tangs an sps branch was fine considering good water params in place and they were
The system did not require freshwater topoff and never strayed from .023 given good sealing which had to be re kalked time to time
If anyone can locate any earlier reference showing any size reef aquarium containing thriving scleractinian corals that did not evaporate at all, no topoff ever, ill paypal you fifty bucks. I think that above is the first sealed reef tank.
Last edited:
Mind blower.Thanks man
the controversial part - feesh
So hopefully it's clear that yes on any normal planet one shouldn't keep marine fish in a half gallon. On every planet
But
This was a rule breaking tank already... it didn't take topoff, was sealed when the lid was on and the refugium pumped the oxygen, and it was sps where sps shouldn't grow but did... So the right fish was the panda goby
It was happy and fed well on bs
Tiny... Sixty body lengths in the tank plus you know these aren't pelagic swimmers like tangs an sps branch was fine considering good water params in place and they were
The system did not require freshwater topoff and never strayed from .023 given good sealing which had to be re kalked time to time
If anyone can locate any earlier reference showing any size reef containing thriving scleractinian corals that did not evaporate at all, no topoff ever, ill paypay you fifty bucks. I think that above is the first sealed reef tank.
