The chase for numbers is a dangerous game to play. Your tank really does talk to you.
For years tanks were run at 11-12 dKh and did great, but technology and interests change over time. My guess is those tanks had much higher nutrients than many tanks today. Yet there is a long thread that somebody has going currently with super high phosphates and a very pretty sps tank. So there continue to be a multitude of ways to manage an sps tank. There is the ZEO, dutch, ULNS, balling, triton plus a lot of old school methods.
We get to choose the 1) intensity, duration and quality of lighting, 2.) nutrient export whether it be by skimmer, water changes, gfo, chaeto, carbon dosing, or water changes 3.) flow however you do it, 4.) temperature control, 5.) nutrient import such feeding fish, adding whatever supplement 6.) minerals and trace elements management such as calcium reactors, dosers, water changes, supplements, kalk,.
How your tank thrives depends on balancing all these factors. I think the goal is finding the "spot" where the tank is happiest and keeping it "dialed in" or stable at that set point.
There are lots of guidelines for recommended ranges but I think chasing numbers without appreciating the interplay of factors is not recommended. I believe that is where many of us get lost, some of our numbers are so good but the tank isn't. Regardless of where you keep your dKh at, zero nitrates and zero phosphates seem to be intolerable for sps health.
And of course, there are always pests. Pests don't really care about ranges, sweet spots, or numbers.