I am looking to change my lighting on my 500 gallon tank. I plan on keeping softies and LPS mostly. My tank is 96 inches long by 40 wide and 30 inches deep. Getting coverage for the 40 width is really giving me pause. I don't want to spend a fortune on radion to get the coverage I would need. I was thinking of giving the viparspectra 300 watt a look. I was thinking if I did 4 of them with the long side running front to back to help cover the 40 inches in that direction and then I would mount them every 2 feet in my canopy. One issue is that I only have about 9 or 10 inches of mounting height above the water in my cabopy. That makes me nervous about hot spots in the coverage at that height. I've been running 4x400 watt MH but wanna change over to led for the heat and electricity savings. Does anyone have any recommendations or a similar size tank that they are running led on?
Keep in mind the 300 is 210Watts in reality..and needing to replace approx 1600W.
You would need at least 6 to maintain close to your current output and you need to run both channels at full.
Normally nobody does that.
Soo now you may be up to 8..
Using the pricing here you are now looking at $1840 and electrical watt parity to the halides on full.
How many watts you lose depends on what you want the tank to look like.
Viparspectra 203W Aquarium Light Timer Control Series T300 LED Grow Light. Best price guarantee on all orders. Fast and secure delivery. Click to learn more
growace.com
You can theoretically save some electricity and some heat but what you will cut down on is evaporation and humidity.
Those fans blowing over the water cool it by evaporative cooling and moving the now airborn water vapor (removing heat) away from the tank and into the room. Thanks to the large amount of IR from the halides.
most led heat is err "up and out" so to speak.
One of the arguments against led says you now need to run your heater more.. soo it basically tells you they are not overly heating the water itself. Funny huh.
Of course some of this depends on how trapping your canopy is.. i.e say vented or open top.
2.4" light thickness and you have 10" max in the canopy.. Considering you have fans on top you will need air space, say at least 1"
So now your effective height from front of light to water is about 6.6"
8" above the water line is considered "normal" though that is arguable.
At 90 degree lensing the lights will spread out w/ the most intensity about 6.6" around the diode panel..
Assuming about 1.5-ish" in on each dimension the actual light rectangle on the water surface will be about
18.7 x 41.7
That should allow most of the light to stay withing the tank and not spill out .
That's the "physics" of it generally and ballpark estimates but should be fairly reasonable.
. The rest is up to other considerations.
And yes 8 seems the sweet spot (most flexibility, wide coverage) though there are a lot of variables including and not limited to the coral species needs and what they are used to...and keep in mind you now have 8 remotes..
Not saying any more about it.