T5 vs Metal Halide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Max2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None
Poseidon, from what I hear from the R&D world, we may move right past LED and go right to plasma. Stay tuned!

Max2000: Both T5 and halide work. In your original post, there were some watt usage specs listed. I would like to see that comparison again, but including data for electronic MH ballasts. I think you'll find the data to be a lot closer.

I also wonder about the cost... I paid nowhere near $1000 for my dual halides with actinics retro, and I didn't get the cheapest option out there.

What do you plan on keeping in the tank? That drives the number of bulbs and the required intensity.

Having said all that, I think it's hard to consider anything but T5 for a tank of 4 foot width or less. T5 is cooler and more cost effective for those applications.

T5 systems do put out heat! You do need fans to keep the air moving, else the output will diminish, and bulb life will shorten as well. I have used setups that came without fans, and it ran hotter than my halides.

Hopefully your tank is not the 72 inch length. With T5, most people use the 3 or 4 foot bulbs over tanks; for the common reef sizes of 36" or 48" wide it works fine. Even a 60" tank can get by with 4 foot bulbs.

A 72" tank won't be able to use that size.... and even though there are 5 foot T5 bulbs available, their output isn't as strong.

That means you'll need to use a system that has 3 foot bulbs, with a bank of 4 to 7 per side (based upon your needs). That is a LOT of bulbs, and can get expensive at changing time. It's also a bit complex and a space hog as well.... and gets harder to cool.

Remember that reflectors are key to T5 output. Get a system with individual reflectors for each bulb. Essential!

Also note that there's a lot of CHEAP T5 systems out there... and that means cheap in terms of quality. Try to stick with name brand products with good ballasts....else you won't get the performance or reliability that you'd likely expect.

Uhh il just share my plans for my tank:smile: all corals require medium to high lighting and water movement. i was going with LPS and soft corals CCGC on the top they require strong lighting and water movement, lps and mushrooms bellow the mid line in a 24" deep standard 90 Gallon tank, with about 1 and half inch of sand.:still_dreaming: basically light hogs with strong water movment on top and happy with any form of lighting corals on the bottom.
 
Last edited:
If you are not going to keep acros or clams, I'd just use T5.... heck, LPS and softies can do just fine with 4 VHO bulbs. The better 4-bulb T5 setups will have more than enough output for your plans.
 
my next tank will have T-5's due to the fact that I will be keeping mainly high end LPS. All the LPS dominate tanks that I have seen lit with T-5's look absolutely fantastic! Now, on the other hand if I was to go strictly SPS then I would go 250w SE Radiums. I currently run 250w DE 20K Helios on my tank and I like them, a lot of my low light lps still need to be shaded though, that is why when I upgrade it will be strictly T-5's they bring out the best coloration in LPS and you don't have to shade the corals as nealry as much as you would with MH
 
I've seen a lot of people with t5 preference for LPS, but I'm skeptical because that hasn't been my experience at all.

The tanks I've run with t5 have all lightened my LPS, and i've run various bulbs combos. I had absolutely stunning growth and color with SPS, but I prefer MH for my LPS...

Having said all this, I love both technologies and believe you can great color out of each; I'm just splitting hairs.

SS
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top