Taking the road less traveled...

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

uniquecorals

UniqueCorals
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
13,377
Reaction score
11,088
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Today, I'm in a bit of a philosophical mode.

I was adding some new livestock to the Unique Corals site, and looking at some of the non-photosynthetic stuff we have in inventory, and it made me reflect upon how the hobby's approach to trying new, less conventional, or hithero "unapproved" stuff has sort of changed. Years ago, featuring Tubastrea and other non-photosynthetic animals would have made you a target for criticism. Nowadays, it's just another group of animals to work with. Technology has caught up with ambition, and we can do what was once frowned upon as "irresponsible" and "radical."


UC5inch-perfect-indo-tubastrea-128-nps.jpg

Not a responsible choice? For who?

I thought about how brave those reefers are who break new ground. Who question convention, and who are the first to seek a better way. I dedicate this blog to them.

Throughout our lives, we’re taught that it’s good to be “first”: Winning the race, being the first in line, the first one to finish our homework, etc. In the reef hobby, however, “first” sometimes carries a little more baggage with it. Have you noticed that?

orangespottedFilefish1.jpg

If you can keep one, you can breed one...That's what MP thought...

When you’re the first hobbyist to keep a challenging coral, breed a fish, or proffer a different way of doing things, you have some serious responsibility- to the animal, the natural environment, and even tougher still- the hobby “establishment”. It’s a heavy weight to shoulder! And in today's internet-enabled hobby, armchair "critics" and "experts" are everywhere- some are informed, some are truly ignorant...and they are all armed with the ability to talk about you and your ideas rather quickly...for better or worse.

Visionaries in our hobby have always suffered the criticisms of those who came before them. I guess it’s human nature to question the gangly newcomers to our little utopia. If you are pioneering a new technique, keeping an animal previously thought un-keepable, or, worse yet- challenging a long-held hobby “truism”, the fact is, you’re likely to take a beating. Or, at the very least, hear a lot of hushed whispers when you walk into the room.

UC2andhalfinch-yellow-tubastrea-rare-color-88.jpg

If you're up to the challenge, and accept the responsibility..


Sad, huh? It is to me. I mean, where would we be if people didn't try new things? Why do we make these progressive hobbyists the scapegoats for our troubles?

The fact is, somebody has to be the first. Somebody has to dip their toes in the water, trying that new technique, or trying to keep the fish once thought impossible. Remember a few years back- the amazing achievement of Matt Pederson, spawning and rearing the Ornate Filefish? This was a fish that would pretty much expose your neck to the chopping block for fellow hobbyists if you dared even try to keep one. Matt not only believed that he could keep and breed the fish- he defied the naysayers and actually did it!

Courage, my friends. And conviction. If you have those traits- and a good idea, go for it!

On the other hand, there is nothing wrong with a bit of healthy skepticism or peer review. Preaching something that is contrary to conventional wisdom (“You can keep non-photosynthetic gorgonians in a reef system”) is one thing- it challenges us to re-think our previously long-held beliefs. However, advocating an idea that, in most cases, will cause harm to our animals (“There is no need to ever change water in closed system aquariums.”) is another thing entirely. And proffering advice that’s downright foolhardy {“I think we should teach our toddlers how to hand-feed Scorpionfish!) will justifiably qualify you for an online assault from the reefkeeping community!

image_full.jpg

Mike Cao didn't hear the naysayers..thankfully.

We have a strong "tribe" and a healthy culture in reef keeping (for the most part), in which forward-thinkers are greeted with some skepticism, and generally embraced after much discourse. It used to be that you'd be run out of town on a rail for suggesting something radical and different. However, in the hobby's more enlightened "post-modern" era, it seems as though we are finally breaking out of that bad habit.


dropoff-reef-aquarium-6.jpg

Philippe Grosjean freed his mind...and helped break a mold with his "drop off" reef.

I’m encouraging more responsible experimentation. Share your data. Force progress. Taunt the conventional. Where would we be if hobbyists continued to believe that the undergravel filter was THE way to maintain a healthy marine aquarium, or if we never tried fragging a stony coral? Yikes! Radical steps are often necessary for change.

Take radical steps. Be bold. Be....unique.

Be yourself.

I leave you with a favorite, possibly over-used, but nonetheless applicable inspirational quote from Apple co-founder and visionary, the late Steve Jobs:

“Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma - which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of other's opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.”

Flying in the face of “conventional wisdom” is a tough, but passable road.

Take it.

Until next time.

Stay Wet...and be bold.

Scott Fellman
Unique Corals
 
Last edited:
Looks like someone had a moment. Great writeup, now if only the rest of the hobby could catch up and not just read this, but BELIEVE.
 
Looks like someone had a moment. Great writeup, now if only the rest of the hobby could catch up and not just read this, but BELIEVE.

Yeah, a morning surf session always helps...And I didn't get nasty or dish on my industry today...What???
-Scott:target:
 
Three years ago I had rocks shipped "live fish" from Vanuatu. I've had or do have hundreds of different species in my tank. Everything from encrusting SPS, zoas, urchins, crabs (some good) to 20 different species of worms, macro algae and plate corals. I can't post a picture of that tank and win a TOTM contest because it doesn't have the sticks; (even though it does have about six different kinds of encrusting SPS) which is so customary in the hobby. But I think my tank is a Marine Biologists dream. A big plus is I haven't had to buy any new creatures, just fish. A couple hitchhikers.

IMG_0789.jpg

003 (8).JPG
 
Three years ago I had rocks shipped "live fish" from Vanuatu. I've had or do have hundreds of different species in my tank. Everything from encrusting SPS, zoas, urchins, crabs (some good) to 20 different species of worms, macro algae and plate corals. I can't post a picture of that tank and win a TOTM contest because it doesn't have the sticks; (even though it does have about six different kinds of encrusting SPS) which is so customary in the hobby. But I think my tank is a Marine Biologists dream. A big plus is I haven't had to buy any new creatures, just fish. A couple hitchhikers.

IMG_0789.jpg
003 (8).JPG

Awesome, Mike! And you know what? At the risk of sounding not so nice, I'll come out and say it: The title "Tank of the Month/Year/Week/Decade", etc. is a joke to me. Who the heck cares what some "experts" think of someone's reef? What does it matter that a few people on a website felt that someone has an attractive tank. It's subjective at best. Every reef has something to teach us. Each one is a real winner.

Besides, many of the so-called "TOTM" systems that I've seen are the same, tried-and-true formula, judged with little regard to more than how cool the coral colonies look or how big and impressive and complicated the equipment is. What's aspirational or inspirational about that? We've homogenized, pre-packaged, and formulated the title to the point where it's almost meaningless, except as an ego boost.

What about the philosophy behind the system; the care given to the animals, the idea behind the concept and aquascaping....the approach? Way more interesting to me than hearing about how some guy spent $14,000 on gadgets and had a custom cabinet built for his tank in his living room. TO me, a "real" TOTM is one that reeks of passion, not arrogance and money. I'm not dissing every TOTM out there. What I am suggesting is that often times, the "best" tank is not really the "best" tank. I'll take a concept reef like Mike Cao's NPS nano, or Jake Adams' "EcoReef Zero" over some conventional 300 gallon SPS reef with a wall of rock and $$$ of gadgets... Soul. It's about soul, IMHO. To all of the TOTM winners everywhere, I apologize if I offended you...I'm not judging you or rendering opinions on your tanks...It's the thought process that the "judges" go through to determine "winners" that I'm being critical of..tried and true makes me want to barf again...

Hmm..maybe we need to do a UC TOTM, "judged" with a more "holistic" approach...? Oh no...I sound too conventional...never mind...Yikes!

Regardless, be proud of your system. Be proud of your attitude, and the love you have for the hobby and all that it encompasses-what really counts....You're a winner in my book..

-Scott

So much for my "chill" vibe today, huh?
 
Last edited:
Here's something unconventional. It's a Mithrax Crab that's been in my reef for 2 1/2 years. Yes, it's a very good crab. It has red eyes, which makes it look evil. Even though there's bubble algae in the tank I sure don't have a problem with it. I had two males, but one of them died. That crab is a good four inches now, he's very shy. This is it's shed. The sheds get collected and dried. I'll bet your conventional TOTM doesn't have one of those in it.

042 (2).jpg
 
Looks like someone had a moment. Great writeup, now if only the rest of the hobby could catch up and not just read this, but BELIEVE.


+1 Someday I really do hope that the majority will be the Believers and not the Nay Sayer's. Being an Artist and bit of an Inventor myself have bucked the tides for most of my adult life and especially the nearly 32 years in this Reefkeeping hobby/passion.

Cheers, Todd


P.S. Scott, looking forward to speaking with you up here at our 'Bob Moore Frag Swap' event next weekend
 
Awesome, Mike! And you know what? At the risk of sounding not so nice, I'll come out and say it: The title "Tank of the Month/Year/Week/Decade", etc. is a joke to me. Who the heck cares what some "experts" think of someone's reef? What does it matter that a few people on a website felt that someone has an attractive tank. It's subjective at best. Every reef has something to teach us. Each one is a real winner.

Besides, many of the so-called "TOTM" systems that I've seen are the same, tried-and-true formula, judged with little regard to more than how cool the coral colonies look or how big and impressive and complicated the equipment is. What's aspirational or inspirational about that? We've homogenized, pre-packaged, and formulated the title to the point where it's almost meaningless, except as an ego boost.

What about the philosophy behind the system; the care given to the animals, the idea behind the concept and aquascaping....the approach? Way more interesting to me than hearing about how some guy spent $14,000 on gadgets and had a custom cabinet built for his tank in his living room. TO me, a "real" TOTM is one that reeks of passion, not arrogance and money. I'm not dissing every TOTM out there. What I am suggesting is that often times, the "best" tank is not really the "best" tank. I'll take a concept reef like Mike Cao's NPS nano, or Jake Adams' "EcoReef Zero" over some conventional 300 gallon SPS reef with a wall of rock and $$$ of gadgets... Soul. It's about soul, IMHO. To all of the TOTM winners everywhere, I apologize if I offended you...I'm not judging you or rendering opinions on your tanks...It's the thought process that the "judges" go through to determine "winners" that I'm being critical of..tried and true makes me want to barf again...

Hmm..maybe we need to do a UC TOTM, "judged" with a more "holistic" approach...? Oh no...I sound too conventional...never mind...Yikes!

Regardless, be proud of your system. Be proud of your attitude, and the love you have for the hobby and all that it encompasses-what really counts....You're a winner in my book..

-Scott

So much for my "chill" vibe today, huh?

Scott's on a roll :)

For the most part, I agree that the vast majority of TOTMs are given to reef aquariums that are 'of the same mold', but at least one site I frequent sometimes gives NOTM to those tanks that are unique and different.

Personally, I can appreciate any tank that is executed well and the animals therein are given the care and attention that they deserve.
 
wow an amazing read, thanks for posting it. Im new to the hobby and ya there are some great tanks out there but most of the time those great giant tanks come with a great giant price tag. I agree with you when you said that all tanks are "real winners" this hobby tests everyones patience and knowledge on a daily basis, and what looks great to one may not be for all. thanks again for the inspiring read!!
 


+1 Someday I really do hope that the majority will be the Believers and not the Nay Sayer's. Being an Artist and bit of an Inventor myself have bucked the tides for most of my adult life and especially the nearly 32 years in this Reefkeeping hobby/passion.

Cheers, Todd


P.S. Scott, looking forward to speaking with you up here at our 'Bob Moore Frag Swap' event next weekend

Totally agree with your philosophy~

Looking forward the swap!

Scott
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top