the advice to input a bunch of ammonia and thereby drive up nitrates is merely something that a group of 1000000 people do on the internet, and tell each other it's required. that's absolutely not the case.
here is a forty page work thread of testless tank cycling
Updated Cycling Science in Action This is a testless reef tank cycling thread, the only one from any board. If you ever had trouble with reef tank cycling in the past, you won't any longer after working some jobs with us. chances are you are using/about to use a method of reef tank cycling...
www.reef2reef.com
(they still give me test pics even though I don't want them lol, it's how we're trained)
every job in that thread used the ten day count to choose the start date, none of their testing mattered we can see.
again in summary: every single tank asking for help in that cycling thread I simply discerned what their day 10 was after adding some bac and food
and that was their assigned start date: not complex science. counting to ten
nobody in that whole thread had to do a big water change at the end.
using a pinch or two of fish food feeds all required bacteria just fine, we show. there wasn't a need to grossly overprove the cycle readiness by driving to 2 ppm ammonia, as the crowd does. It does not help anything at all to dose liquid ammonia repeated, or even once, to 2ppm. we don't even require ammonia use whatsoever to cycle, per above.
for the techies reading highly concerned that fish food is feeding the wrong clade of initial bacteria, ones who will eventually be replaced by the right clades: agreed. nobody cares which clades rotate in and out, they care about initial and ongoing ammonia control, which you can see by looking at anyone's seneye chart went just fine the whole time of transition. we got that part covered ok. it was better to build a system that surpasses the terrible ammonia test kits people use/get sidetracked by/and let the bacteria alternate as they will for a seamless reef cycle, every. single. time.
B