Tank decisions....

Tank 1 or tank 2-which one is better?

  • 72x30x20

    Votes: 36 92.3%
  • 72x24x24

    Votes: 3 7.7%

  • Total voters
    39

Coach63

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
186
Reaction score
52
Location
West Knoxville
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have the opportunity to get a larger tank. The two sizes are listed in this poll. Which one would you choose? Thanks in advance for your input. Both are around the same water volume (180 ish)
 
That is if the width is 30 and height 20. I like the idea of the depth greater for more visual stimulus. Good luck with whichever you choose.
 
I would favor the extra space front to back. If anything, less height will make it easier to have higher PAR.
 
Wider for better aquascaping and shollower makes it easier to reach the bottom for cleaning and arranging.
 
I would say choose depending on what you intend to have in the tank. Large fish go for the tall tank. Lots of small corals go for the shallow tank.
 
I recently went with a 60L x 30W x 24T tank.....it is 187 gallons. IMO, go as wide as you can. It provides some pretty cool aquascaping options. And an external overflow will also give you more room in the tank to work with.

Light-Fixture-pic31.jpg
 
I recently went with a 60L x 30W x 24T tank.....it is 187 gallons. IMO, go as wide as you can. It provides some pretty cool aquascaping options. And an external overflow will also give you more room in the tank to work with.

Light-Fixture-pic31.jpg
Who's the tank manufacturer and who did the stand? Thanks,
 
Mine is 60 x 22 x 36 and its a pain to get to the bottom of the tank at time - and I'm 6'4" so my arms are plenty long. Depending on how you like to set up your rockwork, depth can be a pretty important factor. If you are doing islands, I dont think width is as important, but if you are setting up a "rock wall" type of scape, then width can really be a deciding factor. If I had the choice I like the 24" depth for viewing and working in the reef, width being secondary based on my rock scape choice.
 
Depends on a lot of things. Firstly, what space is it going in to? If it is going to be built in to a wall with limited access, depth can be a disadvantage. However if it is viewable from more than one face, the depth can make for some really great viewing. Also, the stand height matters. I had a 180 with a custom 40" tall stand- it was a pain in the butt! I am 6'3 and had to use a step ladder daily. It made having the tank more work than it was worth. I would prefer a lower overall height and more depth if afforded multiple viewing angles. Good luck!
 
Thanks everyone for your thoughts-it is making my decision easier. I am going to have a 40" stand so I think the shorter height would be best. This is why I love this forum; you get so many opinions of people who have been in the hobby and have already made the mistakes and are willing to help a fellow reefer. Thanks again guys (and gals).
 
Depends on a lot of things. Firstly, what space is it going in to? If it is going to be built in to a wall with limited access, depth can be a disadvantage. However if it is viewable from more than one face, the depth can make for some really great viewing. Also, the stand height matters. I had a 180 with a custom 40" tall stand- it was a pain in the ***! I am 6'3 and had to use a step ladder daily. It made having the tank more work than it was worth. I would prefer a lower overall height and more depth if afforded multiple viewing angles. Good luck!

It is going into our library against a wall. It will be viewable from three sides. As with you, I will also have a 40" stand and I am only 5'10", stepladder it is......
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top