Tank Won’t Cycle… HELP!!

Greg

notice how all problem cycle threads don’t use hanna digital ammonia or seneye


not any of them, not ever. they’re all api or Red Sea test kit posts, not failure to carry bioload posts

Study this collection of misreads:

how are those different from this thread? they’re the same. Some of those are two year stocked reefs posting about stalled cycles



notice how in this thread the cycle is in doubt, just like those, because the title directed the troubleshoot that way. self fulfilling prophecy in cycle troubleshooting


have you ever seen one instance of a cycling chart in a book or a print where the ammonia line doesn’t drop by month two? That claim only happens in reefing forums. It’s the only place, and they’re all driven by api and Red Sea cheap test kit misreads


what does it mean that a two month stuck cycle can’t be replicated by anyone using a digital meter and a reef tank? Do we ignore that fact, ignore the living life in the tank, and still call this a stuck cycle


***when a thread title doesn’t steer the troubleshoot, we can see myriad bacteria bloom reefs on the site who weren’t told the cycle was broken, they were told to buy UV and it worked


this is a false stuck cycle, like all the rest. As soon as this claim is replicated using digital gear, not analog tests, on a reef tank, and we can read that link we could consider the cycle broken. as long as non digital test kits drive this hysteria we can’t claim that.


here’s an alternate thread where ammonia in a display wasn’t counted as a broken cycle recently



do this basic search for bacteria blooms, notice how they werent handled as stuck cycles since the post title didn’t direct them to
53429761-1521-41CA-B4BC-38EBFC74911D.png

read any of those posts to see an easy win using UV light.
 
Last edited:
Greg

I bet the problem cycle you had was also api or Red Sea or a non digital test kit, it wasn’t a digital ammonia reading seeing a stuck cycle.
 
One thing to keep in mind with a bacteria starter products is that even if it was good when put into the bottle, you may have no idea what happened to it before it got to you. Sitting on a hot truck parked at a truck stop in Texas, frozen solid in shipping in Minnesota, sitting on a shelf for 4 years at an LFS that later went out of business and it is being resold, etc.
 
Two months of feeding fixes that worst case scenario. I agree that can affect the first week
 

Feed only, no bottle bac, is ready within a month worst case and when using digital meters I'll bet firmly it's ready by two weeks max. I'm saying that because we're all guessing at complete/incomplete status when using non digital test kits

In some posts non compliant testing is seen as a misread

In this thread, it's a stalled cycle

Truth in cycling isn't inconsistent or charts before us would allow for that

Only reefing + non digital test kits rewrites / wants to rewrite the timing charts that run other industries long before us such as wastewater plants, food producing facilities etc.

The ammonia control line from a cycling chart isn't found in doubt when dealing in digital kits
Whatever committee ends up deciding the next article on reef tank cycling must account for this stark pattern, it's a fair request to rectify that before convening

Digital testing simply must be the basis of the next update on cycling chemistry, we're stuck with 1998 rules until that's completed
 
This tank is cycled, but has a common bacterial bloom

** once we get visible pics there might even be benthic growth verifications of completed cycling on the rocks or sand, watch for that potential outcome once we can see into the tank
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top