Wow thanks for the detailed answer!
Happy to help!
True. I unfortunately had too much of dinos at the moment (they started growing on my porcelain crab too !!). I must say that after yesterday I installed the UV light and cut all the macros overgrown with dinos, the situation now looks much better. I covered the tank with towels and turned off all my lights. For now it seems clean but I know its too early to decide if it worked.
It sounds like a good decision what you did here. I personally think UVs are underutilized but don’t really believe in 24/7 use as they have their drawbacks as well. On my personal tank I keep mine hooked up but off unless I have an issue. But on the rare occasions it’s needed , it’s a good tool
As with any organism, if you don’t want to propagate you’ve got to either neutralize it or cut off its food supply. Sounds like you did a good combo here. Looking forward to a hopefully positive turnout.
Yes I usually do this weekly. My problem was that with my test kit for pH, for example, I was sure I had ph 8, but apparently the test was not that accurate. I also found out that if I use my pipette for measuring the water for the test it differs from the vials provided by the test brand (sera). Basically they say "fill until 5ml mark" but its not really 5ml. This had me testing for weeks in the wrong way probably.
I tested today pH at my lfs but I think that- their pH probe is not working well. Was giving pH 7.1 and all the other probes in the lab are on 7.6-7.7 range. I get basically 3 different measures from 3 different probes
Sorry to hear about your testing challenges. I’ve experienced the same issues personally until I just f got better equipment or stopped testing, depending on the parameters and over time for cost reasons.
Even Hanna, which is great, isn’t so consistent with the markings on their vials. I measure all my samples using syringes or pipettes.
I think the general consensus is that pH meters are the most accurate way to measure pH, but their calibration and maintenance are critical and probes’ lifespans are finite. Might be worth asking when theirs have been calibrated and replaced. Some businesses will sacrifice result quality in lieu of less frequent maintenance/replacement.
We’ve had a lot of advances in the past 20 years as far as understanding aquarium chemistry and how things work, but poor data quality with testing coupled with our knowledge is still now biggest issue. I think we generally test too much and don’t always consider the quality of the test results before taking action on them.
Yes this sounds like a good idea. I actually was reducing WC to increase my N and P, but since I can dose now I could try with this.
I hate WCs as much as anyone, but for some purposes they really are the best option. On my own tank I’m trying to generally reduce WCs over time because I don’t like doing
but if anything goes south or gets weird, a WC sooner than later is usually a good idea.
I’d be weary of dosing P or N directly long term though it’s a great way to fix an N/P imbalance such as when your algae or bacteria are limited by one or the other. I keep some of these chemicals available and use them quite rarely but they are good when needed. Long term hopefully you can find a good balance of import/export to get where you want to get with those parameters without dosing.
I would rather avoid rip clean since I don't have another tank where to relocate temporarily my stuff. Also fish and inverts look healthy, better not to play with fire.
I agree with you, if it were my tank I also wouldn’t do a rip clean just thought I’d mention the thought. If your inhabitants are healthy, short of the dino issue and wanting to add corals, it could be argued you don’t even have an issue.
Yes this is also what the guy at my LFS told me. I am just a bit ticked because everything comes with big costs with this hobby and if I can manage to solve the problem without buying a lot of unnecessary items I would rather try that way. Many people told me that skimmer is not necessary since I have so many macros, but I did not consider the problem with pH. My plan now would be to raise kH to the upper limit (11-12 dkH) and see how it goes with pH. If stays stable around 8 despite CO2 higher than usual I would be happy. If it does not work I am going to either install a sump or get a hob skimmer and co2 scrubber.
Well you don’t need a skimmer. It’s a choice, I’ve always run one but plenty of people don’t and have wonderful tanks. A skimmer is just one tool you can consider.
We know thriving macro algae can control nutrients and you wouldn’t be wrong at all for using that entirely.
For pH, many people run at 7.8 ish with no issue and I’m still not convinced 7.5 was an accurate measurement. But out of experience getting the pH up would benefit your tank. The skimmer/CO2 scrubber can be a valuable tool for this.
The thing is, a scrubber basically consumes CO2 from the feed air to the skimmer which assuming your ambient air is high CO2, then pulls CO2 from the water -> pH goes up. But another angle is that your macro while photosynthesizinshould suck CO2 out of the water do the same thing

.
So if you made the choice to use macro algae as your primary nutrient export method I think we can still get your pH up without a skimmer. That’s to say if you add a skimmer I wouldn’t suggest you do it for pH alone. A good one certainly isn’t cheap. And keep in mind if the ambient CO2 is really high, if adding a skimmer but not CO2 scrubbing or running a line outside you might lower the temperature pH further.
I’d still go the high pH 2 part before the skimmer. Also if wanting the benefits of CO2 scrubbed air but don’t want a skimmer, we really could consider a CO2 scrubbed airline feeding an airstone after your refugium.
Actually my tank is skimmerless now as I’m upgrading and removed the old skimmer while the new skimmer hasn’t yet arrived. pH lower as expected, but still bottoms out at 8.1-8.2 and goes to 8.4 before lights out.
So in sum I think we can get you where you want to be with or without a skimmer.
KH 11-12 should be fine but go there slowly. I have heard people say corals are more likely to RTN at very high alk but no idea if it’s real. As you push alk up, you’ll see a pH increase if everything else is constant. Just take it slow and steady, and if you have issues stop increasing it further.
What's the difference with Na3CO3 only? I tested Ca and Mg and they are in the right range, giving that I have no corals yet. Maybe coralline could be using those in the long term.. I can see it growing quite fast on the back of the tank.
Ca and Mg wouldn’t be directly related to your alkalinity dosing but of course will be consumed with alkalinity so great that they’re where you want them. It’s a very good sign that you have coralline. In many ways it means you already have a good enough environment for many corals.
For alkalinity, about the differences, if we consider 3 options, the differences are in the second half of the formula (the “negative” side”), call them option:
1. NaHCO3 (sodium bicarbonate)
2. Na2CO3 (sodium carbonate)
3. NaOH (sodium hydroxide)
Long story short, in the end once everything is in equilibrium, there is no difference as all of these species exist anyway in equilibrium in the water. But upon adding them, at first you’ll see a pH effect with item 1 giving no big impact or even a slight decrease, while 2 would give a moderate pH increase, and 3 would give a significant pH increase. This also tells you the amount of caution and care you should use when adding them, in numerical order
Item 3 is a strong base, it’s what’s in Drano anyway. So handle with care, don’t get it on you and especially not in your eyes, and dose only tiny amounts frequently and into high flow. Use Randy’s recipes if going 2 part, to prevent long term ionimbalances over time.
If not using a quality dosing pump I’d avoid NaOH personally.
Yes good point. I have no dosing pumps yet (I actually don't even have a decent led for corals yet), but I can just manually dose every morning and evening dividing the solution 14 times.
Well, just get dosing pumps when it makes sense for you. Lights are probably the better investment. I actually manually dose everything I use besides 2 part manually as I enjoy it.
But if dosing manually I’d avoid option 3. And keep an eye out for pH effects right after adding them
Thanks so much for the advice. I am not too much concerned until my livestock is healthy and eating, but until I solve this ph and dino problems I don't want to add corals. Which is annoying but, well, better to wait than to waste money and corals.
My pleasure. I think you’re doing the right things. Your tank inhabitants are healthy, that says more than any test can and I wouldn’t base not adding corals just on a pH concern.
You’ve got a reef tank and you want to add corals. Livestock is healthy and algae including coralline is growing. It’s normal for you to want to add corals, and I’d say if it were my tank, even considering your situation, I’d add some bulletproof ones.
Personally I’d say don’t make yourself wait over test results. Leathers, green nepthea, mushrooms of the beautiful but affordable variety, green star polyps. Perhaps Xenia. Zoas. Really, these are essential impossible to kill and they don’t need that much light.
If the unlikely but still possible situation of them dying worries you, just plan a LFS or friend as a pre agreed backup to take them and babysit them for a while if you run into trouble.
If it were me at this stage, I’d add a a single nice looking leather or some GSP. Maybe a green nepthea. See how it goes. And even if you’re going mainly SPS later, these can still fit in beautifully
You might be surprised by your success.
Adam