- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 22,424
- Reaction score
- 34,869
I think the most notable thing that comes out of it is: Fish in a stable tank with good husbandry will be resistant of disease. I think this holds true regardless of QT.
That is a sweeping generalization, lumping all "disease" into one category. Most healthy humans handle a cold virus just fine, but would be in a world of trouble if exposed to Malaria, Tuberculosis, Ebola, H5N1, meningitis, etc. Without prompt medical treatment.
The same can be said of ich & gram-positive bacterial infections (relatively mild) vs. velvet, brook, uronema, gram-negative bacterial infections (usually fatal without treatment).
Secondary infections then started to break out, and I lost almost all of my fish. It was like this chain of events rapidly unfolding in front of my very eyes, but I was powerless to stop it. It was an emotionally devastating experience for me, as some of these fish were 10+ years old. I KNOW my fish would have probably lived if the tank didn't have ich, because other local hobbyists (who never saw ich during the entire ordeal) managed to save most of their fish despite operating under the same conditions. It was this experience, more than any other, which finally changed my mind about "ich management", and I decided to prophylactically treat in QT moving forward.


