Thoroughly modern silly...

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

uniquecorals

UniqueCorals
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
13,377
Reaction score
11,088
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It seems as though not a day goes by when you don’t hear about some new product, animal or technique that will help change the hobby forever. Crazy, modern, new things that promise to simplify and improve our hobby experience. Some are great. Some add to the complications we already deal with in the hobby. Complication. Complexity. These are kind of "old school" philosophies, if you ask me. For some reason, many of us in the hobby seem mired in the past, with a “more complicated must be better” philosophy. (You've probably heard me rant on this before. In fact, I'm sure you have.)


807_Reef_Tank_1.jpg

Steve Weast's tank was one of the greatest of all time. Certainly not simple, but not ridiculously complex, either. Aquaristic skill and technology combined to form a "reef for the ages."

To this end, we equip our systems with tons of gadgetry with the intent of recreating the reef environment., and employ complex, militant protocols to keep the environment within a precise range.

However, lately, I find myself turning to (and preaching) a more disciplined, yet simplified approach to reef keeping.

Do you ever wonder why we collectively seem to like to make things so complicated? I attribute this “complication syndrome” to a few possible factors:

1. We think that we ARE making things easy on ourselves. We have busy lives, so we’ve bought into the idea that more complex systems will help us spend less time working on our reefs, and more time enjoying them. The point of a hobby is enjoyment, right? Strange paradox here, though: If multi-stage zeolite reactors, complex additive dosing regimens, two-chambered calcium reactors, automatic top-off/water change systems, and eight-way water return devices make your “job” easier, that’s good, right? Well, don't you have to maintain all of that stuff? Where is the “savings?” Technologically complex systems and approaches seem to have become a necessity in our minds, yet they sometimes make things tougher, IMHO.


base_station_ckt_schem_complicated.jpg

OMG, this saves me 7 minutes a week scraping algae off the front glass. Ain't technology grand?


2. We like to buy stuff and impress each other. Hey, who can argue with THAT? It feels good to show off that sexy, expensive protein skimmer or uber-high end LED lighting system…doesn’t it? In all seriousness, I’m sure few hobbyists really set up a system costing thousands of dollars simply to “one up” their buddies, but after reading some tank build threads on hobby forums, I just can’t help but wonder about this sometimes. I’m particularly entertained by the responses of other reefers on these build threads, seemingly impressed at the sheer bombastic nature of the builder as the builder brags about the thousands that he or she is spending on their tank, and the “Wow, I hope my tank is like yours one day!” responses from readers. Yuck!


images-1.jpeg

"Here are my latest pics of my 72 gallon build! Today, I tested the 96-way titanium actuated ball valve assembly for my refugium..."


3. Because that’s how it has always been done! Okay, there is some merit to this one. We tend to follow the tried and true. As we’ve discussed in previous posts, discoveries of the past help influence the breakthroughs of the future. If something works for us, we tend to stick with it- perhaps tweaking a few things here and there as we go. Yet, think of how heretical it was back in the day to get rid of our plastic filter media or to actually feed our reef tanks! Paradigm shifts involve a certain degree of risk, and perhaps we’ve become adverse to risk or criticism in this forum-based hobby area.

4. If something is more complicated, it MUST be better and safer! Again, back to the infamous build threads: “This guy has 5 different reactors and two types of controllers running the show. All of these functions are automated! He MUST know what he’s doing!” Perhaps it’s because he DOESN’T know what he's doing…ever considered that? Complexity for complexity’s sake is NOT cool. Very “1990’s”, if you ask me.

Look, I am not trash-talking everyone with a complex reef system with tons of cool gadgets and exotic husbandry protocols. I’m not a technophobe. I’m not suggesting that we go back to the “good old days”- a simpler and more gentle time…NO!

What I am doing is questioning the need for such complexity in everything. Look, we love our Apex controllers at Unique Corals. They are fabulous, making monitoring and control of basic functions in our warehouse extremely easy. Amazing stuff. But guess what? These fantastic systems are not intended by their designers to replace the “art” of aquaristics, nor are they intended to be a technological “crutch” to make up for our shortcomings at aquarium management.


NS_apex_group__76397_zoom1.jpg

We love our Apex...But it works FOR us...We don't work for IT!

Sure, I’ll be the first to tell you that water quality management is a key to success in reefkeeping, yet I’ll also be the first guy to tell you that just picking up a siphon house weekly or more frequently is the ultimate expression of water quality management. All of the technology in the world is not going to save your system if you don’t have the fundamentals down. The John Tullock gem, “More biology- less technology” is so applicable to us.


Thank goodness we are collectively starting to rethink some long-held hobby beliefs and simplifying our approaches — to the benefit of both our animals and our pocketbooks! A great example of this is the wonderful way we have traditionally applied water movement in our systems. If you need to create intense flow patterns, it’s long been held that you need an armada of pumps, baffles, closed loops, powerheads, and other flow-enhancing devices to do the job. While all of these devices have their places, the truth is that you can create outstanding water movement with the logical application of a few very modest powerheads directed in a thoughtful manner.

The gyre flow theory that you often hear me hint at really makes a lot of sense. “Intelligent flow”, if you will, can far exceed the benefits derived by the over-application of numerous water movement devices. Yet, for some reason, we hobbyists LOVE to make things more complicated, more expensive, and more challenging by stubbornly clinging to the unnecessary practice of deploying tons of powerheads into one tank, when a mere few applied intelligently will do the job. Let’s keep it simple here, for our own sanity and budgets!


6inch-purple-tip-green-spathulata-aussie-238.jpg

THESE guys tell us all we need to know about keeping corals.It's up to us to listen to them.

I think we also make things pretty intimidating for newbies. Advising the newbie to equip his or her small reef tank with every conceivable technological prop for success, and keep every water parameter at precise target numbers perpetuates the myth that marine systems are more complicated than any other aquarium that you can maintain. Yes, there are some minimum equipment requirements that you have in order to outfit and maintain a reef tank. However, I can’t help but wonder if giving the new reefer one more bag of salt mix, a siphon hose, and the admonition to use both regularly and frequently would benefit him/her far more than any multi-stage reactor would.

Again, don’t get me wrong. All of the cool technology and equipment has its place, and there is a certain “barrier to entry” of skill acquisition that you need to hit in order to gain success in the hobby. However, in this new era of the reef hobby, I think that it’s important to step back once in a while and re-evaluate what we’re trying to accomplish, why we are doing what we’re doing, and what really works. I’ll hazard a guess that we can simplify things and still enjoy great success.


Simple, yet focused approaches are used every day by the pioneering hobbyists that are breeding marine fishes and propagating corals. Their systems, husbandry techniques, and approaches are based upon a specific need — fish and coral reproduction, and the results of this focused approach are being demonstrated regularly.

The bigger picture here is that the application of a more simplistic, focused approach can — and has been — leading to huge advancements in the hobby. I’m not encouraging you to eschew all technology, nor to abandon the fun of the community tank or the diverse “reef garden.” I am encouraging you to step back now and then to make things easier on yourself. A successful reef aquarium need not be a complicated technical endeavor.

It needs to be a “logical” one. That's the "postmodern" way.

Until next time…Keep it simple— and Stay Wet

Scott Fellman
Unique Corals
 
Last edited:
Love the points. How many of the "pioneers" started with a glass box, under gravel filter, air pump and a love for corals? Sure your controller can fade lights, but do the corals care? I dont think so. Do you need 24x7 reporting of parameters? no. Sure the gadgets are fun, but try keeping a basic tank without even a timer. That is impressive. Anything else is just eye candy.
 
Scott, you mention John Tullock again which book are you refering to? It been a long time since I read him and you have mentioned him before. Also not to be dumb but you mention intellegent flow, not sure I know whwt you refer to sir.
As always after keeping saltwater on and off for so long its not always easy and the amount of information is imense. It is fun reading your threads. You should publish it would be a great read..
Ken
 
any chance you'd want to do a writeup on gyre flow? it's tough to find info on it.. I didn't think most corals liked constant laminar flow? I've see you mention this before and it always makes me curious..
 
Great write up! I feel myself lucky enough to personally go see steve's tank when it was up and running. It was an amazing system and not overly complex as you stated
 
[h=1]John Tullock - Natural Reef Aquariums: Simplified Approaches to Creating Living Saltwater Microcosms[/h]
My favorite single reef aquarium book.

For me, this is one of your best articles so far, Scott. Any newbie should reed this before plunking down that hard earned cash thinking that the more gadgets they have the better their chances of success.

I look at what the fish and corals need to prosper and then find the simplest, most economical/reliable/environmentally friendly way to meet those requirements.
 
Scott, you mention John Tullock again which book are you refering to? It been a long time since I read him and you have mentioned him before. Also not to be dumb but you mention intellegent flow, not sure I know whwt you refer to sir.
As always after keeping saltwater on and off for so long its not always easy and the amount of information is imense. It is fun reading your threads. You should publish it would be a great read..
Ken

Hey Ken,

Good points and questions...

John Tullock is the author of "Natural Reef Aquariums", which, in my opinion, is one of the greatest hobby books ever published...I think it's out of print, but you can find used copies now and again... A "must have."

Natural Reef Aquariums: Simplified Approaches to Creating Living Saltwater Microcosms: John H. Tullock, Jr. Martin A. Moe: 0681290087003: Amazon.com: Books

"Intelligent Flow" is my way of saying that, rather than having tons of powerbeads, outlets, and complicated plumbing schemes to generate water movement within the aquarium, you're employing a few well-placed pumps or returns, with gross water movement in mind.

Woosh!

Scott
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Points 2 and 4 are spot on. It's great that someone can buy all the latest gadgets and doo dads. But that doesn't mean they have an understanding of husbandry and how to maintain the tank in the long run. I'm a big fan of keep it simple stupid. More often than not, those big spenders wind up selling their goodies.

I come across new people looking to get into the hobby all the time and they feel so exasperated because they can't afford something. I tell them always to save money by researching your interest and not get pulled into this "you need this and this and this" game. Money is in decent lights, skimmer, and rodi. Everything else is a gimmick.
 
any chance you'd want to do a writeup on gyre flow? it's tough to find info on it.. I didn't think most corals liked constant laminar flow? I've see you mention this before and it always makes me curious..

There is a lot out there by Jake Adams...Good information that you can distill into practical use for your reef...We employ this philosophy at UC, but it's the one competitive advantage we don't really want to go into detail about! I love sharing almost everything...almost... It's sort of like the "Stealth' technology...Raw data and some cursory information was published by a Russian engineer in the 60's, but no one took notice until Northrup dug it up and applied it to the F-119 and B2. It was there for the taking...

It's not complicated, really...Just a few trial-and-error things to figure out. We worked pretty hard to get this working just right at UC , and I'd rather not just hand that off to the competition, capitalist pig that I am! We've had others try to duplicate our website design, marketing approaches, etc., with questionable results, so best to let them try to figure out our flow system that way, too! :neutral:

Suffice it to say, Jake's writings tell you just about everything you need to know about this concept..

-Scott (feeling kinda evil...)
 
[h=1]John Tullock - Natural Reef Aquariums: Simplified Approaches to Creating Living Saltwater Microcosms[/h]
My favorite single reef aquarium book.

For me, this is one of your best articles so far, Scott. Any newbie should reed this before plunking down that hard earned cash thinking that the more gadgets they have the better their chances of success.

I look at what the fish and corals need to prosper and then find the simplest, most economical/reliable/environmentally friendly way to meet those requirements.

Thanks, and good to hear from another JT fan!

I am glad it didn't come off too "technophobic!", as I certainly love tech...Just not in place of mastering the "art" of reef keeping!

-Scott
 
Great write up! I feel myself lucky enough to personally go see steve's tank when it was up and running. It was an amazing system and not overly complex as you stated

It was epic..He's a cool guy with visionary talent and interesting approaches...a super reefer with amazing skills...I, too, was fortunate enough to see this tank, and still think of it so highly...

-Scott
 
Love the points. How many of the "pioneers" started with a glass box, under gravel filter, air pump and a love for corals? Sure your controller can fade lights, but do the corals care? I dont think so. Do you need 24x7 reporting of parameters? no. Sure the gadgets are fun, but try keeping a basic tank without even a timer. That is impressive. Anything else is just eye candy.

:hippie:

You got it!
 
Love the points. How many of the "pioneers" started with a glass box, under gravel filter, air pump and a love for corals? Sure your controller can fade lights, but do the corals care? I dont think so. Do you need 24x7 reporting of parameters? no. Sure the gadgets are fun, but try keeping a basic tank without even a timer. That is impressive. Anything else is just eye candy.
Agree so much.
 
There is a lot out there by Jake Adams...Good information that you can distill into practical use for your reef...We employ this philosophy at UC, but it's the one competitive advantage we don't really want to go into detail about! I love sharing almost everything...almost... It's sort of like the "Stealth' technology...Raw data and some cursory information was published by a Russian engineer in the 60's, but no one took notice until Northrup dug it up and applied it to the F-119 and B2. It was there for the taking...

It's not complicated, really...Just a few trial-and-error things to figure out. We worked pretty hard to get this working just right at UC , and I'd rather not just hand that off to the competition, capitalist pig that I am! We've had others try to duplicate our website design, marketing approaches, etc., with questionable results, so best to let them try to figure out our flow system that way, too! :neutral:

Suffice it to say, Jake's writings tell you just about everything you need to know about this concept..

-Scott (feeling kinda evil...)

lol, I wasn't looking for your trade secrets (or exact setup), just some general info on the gyre idea.. I've done some reading but there just isn't enough info out there (that I can find anyway)..

I'll see if iI can find the articles by jake adams.

Thanks.
 
I do think there are a decent number of people that have a good enough grasp on technology and the chemistry of a reef tank and can implement the technology very successfully.

Where it comes to bite them in the butt is when they think their technology has replaced them and they for instance no longer need to test the water because they think they had the trend set right.
 
lol, I wasn't looking for your trade secrets (or exact setup), just some general info on the gyre idea.. I've done some reading but there just isn't enough info out there (that I can find anyway)..

I'll see if iI can find the articles by jake adams.

Thanks.

Yeah, I kinda felt slimy saying "no", but we need to keep a few things under our belts...LOL

However, there is plenty of information out their in Jake's Advanced Aquarist articles from a few years back.

-Scott
 
I do think there are a decent number of people that have a good enough grasp on technology and the chemistry of a reef tank and can implement the technology very successfully.

Where it comes to bite them in the butt is when they think their technology has replaced them and they for instance no longer need to test the water because they think they had the trend set right.

Yup- bullseye! No replacing the intuition and insight of a "wet thumb" reefer!

-Scott
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top