To add a calcium reactor or not?

Currdawg12

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
177
Reaction score
80
What state or country do you live in
Kentucky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So my tank is a 45 gallon with a reef breeders photonv2 and one power head but seems like my coral aren’t taking off like I would like. Would adding a calcium reactor or adding a t5 light be better?
 
Without any numbers on water or par levels on lighting in your tank we can not make a good guess .

Calcium-350
Phosphate-0
Nitrate-5
Ammonia-0
Salt 1.023

Don’t have par reading on my tank but at 12 inch above the water and 24inch long tank I should be getting around 150 to 200 everywhere
 
That’s like asking would getting a car be better or buying a blender.

Two different things. That do two different jobs.

Get a calcium reactor when you have enough alk and cal consumption to justify the expense. Get the lights when you are ready to get corals because without good lights a cal reactor would be just an expensive paperweight.

I meant no offense by the way. The analogy was meant to be a joke not an insult.
 
That’s like asking would getting a car be better or buying a blender.

Two different things. That do two different jobs.

Get a calcium reactor when you have enough alk and cal consumption to justify the expense. Get the lights when you are ready to get corals because without good lights a cal reactor would be just an expensive paperweight.

I meant no offense by the way. The analogy was meant to be a joke not an insult.

Spot on.
 
I would try and get parameters in a more acceptable range first. Acceptable range meaning based off what the bulk of other reefers are running.
If it were my tank I would bump calcium over 400. Get some po4 in the tank by feeding more. I would raise salinity to 1.025/1.026.
I would stick with 2 part if you are not seeing a lot of growth. More than likely it’s your parameters causing growth inhibition without knowing your par/spectrum and the age of your tank.
 
That’s like asking would getting a car be better or buying a blender.

Two different things. That do two different jobs.

Get a calcium reactor when you have enough alk and cal consumption to justify the expense. Get the lights when you are ready to get corals because without good lights a cal reactor would be just an expensive paperweight.

I meant no offense by the way. The analogy was meant to be a joke not an insult.

Lol no offense here! I’m new to everything. But I do have good leds but just curious if adding a t5 would help but I think I’ll will try working on the parameters more
 
I would try and get parameters in a more acceptable range first. Acceptable range meaning based off what the bulk of other reefers are running.
If it were my tank I would bump calcium over 400. Get some po4 in the tank by feeding more. I would raise salinity to 1.025/1.026.
I would stick with 2 part if you are not seeing a lot of growth. More than likely it’s your parameters causing growth inhibition without knowing your par/spectrum and the age of your tank.

Tanks only 4 months old but I’m just curious if there are tricks or things I can add on now to help me later. Mostly because I have a little extra money at the moment
 
Tanks only 4 months old but I’m just curious if there are tricks or things I can add on now to help me later. Mostly because I have a little extra money at the moment
Get your parameters in line, especially alk. You need stability more than anything.

What led are you running?
 
Your led is fine. I've grown sps with photon v2s. What is your alkalinity. I see you didnt post it and in my opinion that's the most important parameter to be testing
 
Magnesium matters just as much as alk and cal as well.
 
Magnesium matters just as much as alk and cal as well.
I disagree. Some people dont dose mag, some dose once a week, some dose daily. Mag can be ran from 1300 - 1500 and still be good. Let your alk bounce around from 8-10 and see what happens. Ime alk swings should be at most .2dkh per week, but I keep only sps. Other corals may tolerate more of a swing
 
I disagree. Some people dont dose mag, some dose once a week, some dose daily. Mag can be ran from 1300 - 1500 and still be good. Let your alk bounce around from 8-10 and see what happens. Ime alk swings should be at most .2dkh per week, but I keep only sps. Other corals may tolerate more of a swing

Honestly I haven’t ever checked alk and don’t really know how
 
Get calcium reactor out of your head until you are bored silly dosing 2 part or kalk

And you have done so many DKH tests that you can tell what your alk is by looking at your corals
 
Last edited:
I disagree. Some people dont dose mag, some dose once a week, some dose daily. Mag can be ran from 1300 - 1500 and still be good. Let your alk bounce around from 8-10 and see what happens. Ime alk swings should be at most .2dkh per week, but I keep only sps. Other corals may tolerate more of a swing
I agree alk swings are more harmful; I just meant mag should be included in testing just like alk and cal to insure the big 3 are in balance.
 
So if I can a alk swing how do I stabilize it
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top