when taking pictures of non tank related things do you guys like or dislike the editing that can easily be done nowadays?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Editing to an extent. I feel like you are cutting yourself short if you do not edit because I always think of what the image could have been. I am not talking about completely re-creating an image though. Also, sometimes I feel like editing is necessary. For example in the following photos. I did not add any colors to these pictures or anything. I primary edit the lighting, shadows, contrast, etc..
I edited in photoshop RAW then photoshop cs5 and then lightroom 3.
I am not a pro or even close so these were probably not edited the best they could have been.
These are the jpegs un-edited. (RAWs are basically darker but pb won't store them)
Before
![]()
After
![]()
Before
![]()
After
![]()
I think editing to make the photo more closely represent what you actually see in person is totally ok, but I don't think it is ok to embellish the piece. Unless for personal enjoyment. For instance, I think in the pics that KLR posted above that the edited pictures, while stunning, don't look like they represent what is seen if you were standing there looking at the city scape... unless you had help.
when taking pictures of non tank related things do you guys like or dislike the editing that can easily be done nowadays?
wow those are some great pics kelby. and yeah i see what you mean I just have a hard time finding that find line of some of my images
heres the link to my pb Pictures by Rileybesecker - Photobucket
take a look at the before and after in the two different albums
why would edit raw, then cs5 then light room? light room should really be before cs5, ps is really a much more pixel bending and super deep editing program.
Sent from my SPH-P100 using Tapatalk
editing is an art and its pure peference.
im a wedding a photographer by trade and i do edit to a point as there are things the human eye does not notice or "overlooks" or can adjust too that the camera can not adjust too.
for example bags under eyes are super prevelant in a lot of shooting situations, i edit that.
also i turn all auto type settings in the camera off, i want control.of the final product, so my.images are muddy, flat and soft straight out of the camera and i fix it all in post.
i have a workflow that allows me to cull and edit 5000+ photos in about 2 hours time, but most people that just take a few photos dont need an super streamlined workflow.
again its all preferance, for people who think.overly saturated and edited photos dont sell, look up peter lik and attempt to buy one of.his, this hobby will look like peanuts.
Sent from my SPH-P100 using Tapatalk


