- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
- Messages
- 30,220
- Reaction score
- 24,063
- Location
- tejas
- What state or country do you live in
- Alaska
if you try and assemble parts and pieces of fix info Robin it wont work the same as handing over the reigns for someone remotely.
your reef could easily, easily be zoomed into compliance in about a week but not by you picking the best sounding options, its by only running the plan. nanos have a rescue option that large tanks do not have, specifically because they are small and a five gallon water change strategically ran is 20~% of your water. that accessibility can be used a certain way to fix your tank from bottom to top, you wont have to test params to attain this. its a manner of cleaning and how you feed and guide the system, its not in a dose or a test reading.
its doing everything opposite the lfs tried to sell you. you'd be hands on vs hands off, and that will fix things like you want them to be
when you are on the absolute last stage of experimentation, about to start reconsidering the hobby-remember this option, takes about a week. we already have a recent job from the nanos forum on file, he's week 4 and looking strong and already upgrading his totally clean tank. formerly dinos packed. Tokash23 in the nanos forum the work is right there for study.
there is a certain way you clean the reef to make a fresh start, and then a certain way you feed it for several months to pack back in coral mass. not anyone I know runs reefs in this way, we use it to rescue reefs that are following the rules and not having fun. if more nanos were ran this way, there'd be less loss and more coral mass gained at the expense of water changed to process it all like exercise, literal reef tank exercise vs sitting there passively invaded.
there's nothing bigtime wrong with your picture, real reefs look worse in places. the matter is do you want it gone, do you consider it an eyesore. if so, we have means....
your reef could easily, easily be zoomed into compliance in about a week but not by you picking the best sounding options, its by only running the plan. nanos have a rescue option that large tanks do not have, specifically because they are small and a five gallon water change strategically ran is 20~% of your water. that accessibility can be used a certain way to fix your tank from bottom to top, you wont have to test params to attain this. its a manner of cleaning and how you feed and guide the system, its not in a dose or a test reading.
its doing everything opposite the lfs tried to sell you. you'd be hands on vs hands off, and that will fix things like you want them to be
when you are on the absolute last stage of experimentation, about to start reconsidering the hobby-remember this option, takes about a week. we already have a recent job from the nanos forum on file, he's week 4 and looking strong and already upgrading his totally clean tank. formerly dinos packed. Tokash23 in the nanos forum the work is right there for study.
there is a certain way you clean the reef to make a fresh start, and then a certain way you feed it for several months to pack back in coral mass. not anyone I know runs reefs in this way, we use it to rescue reefs that are following the rules and not having fun. if more nanos were ran this way, there'd be less loss and more coral mass gained at the expense of water changed to process it all like exercise, literal reef tank exercise vs sitting there passively invaded.
there's nothing bigtime wrong with your picture, real reefs look worse in places. the matter is do you want it gone, do you consider it an eyesore. if so, we have means....
Last edited:



