- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 203
- Reaction score
- 115
- Location
- Plano, TX
- What state or country do you live in
- Texas
I had an unfortunate bout with velvet that wiped out most of my fish. The two survivors, a Purple Tang and a Bangaii Cardinalfish, were treated with Chlorquine Phosphate for 30 days, and have been in QT for an additional 45 days or so since (75 days total now). So I am relatively confident I wiped out any issues with the fish.
I have since then become more familiar with the recommended process of treating fish with CP. The fish have been in the same tank during and post-CP. So if any velvet cysts released after the 30 days of CP treatment then the fish would be infected again.
My concern is that given that these fish are obviously relatively resistant to velvet that they could be carriers again. There are otherwise no signs of velvet on the fish. Should I assume I have done all that is necessary and pop them into my fallow-treated DT, or should I re-treat the fish with this time doing a single TTM before removing CP from the water column? I am [obviously] gun shy with this after going through absolute hell a few months ago.
I have since then become more familiar with the recommended process of treating fish with CP. The fish have been in the same tank during and post-CP. So if any velvet cysts released after the 30 days of CP treatment then the fish would be infected again.
My concern is that given that these fish are obviously relatively resistant to velvet that they could be carriers again. There are otherwise no signs of velvet on the fish. Should I assume I have done all that is necessary and pop them into my fallow-treated DT, or should I re-treat the fish with this time doing a single TTM before removing CP from the water column? I am [obviously] gun shy with this after going through absolute hell a few months ago.



