Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I possibly should have made this as a poll, may have been easier. But curious to hear more feedback from people that have been dosing trace elements for a while and their thoughts on it
IMO if you are doing regular water changes , no need to add any trace elements.

What's good? Seachem Plus ? Complete? Trace?
what product do you use?I dose trace elements daily with calcium and alkalinity. I only had bad experiences (repeatedly) dosing no trace elements. I look at the corals and if the trace elements additions improve polyp opening and growth of corals it is good I guess.
The Balling method itself does not include trace elements additions except the trace elements to balance the sodium and chloride added with the calcium and bicarbonate. But I have also developed a trace elements formula calculated from the trace elements in the skeletons of corals and coralline algae. I frequently got the reply that it does not include the trace elements of the soft tissue. How much of the total dry mass of a scleractinian is soft tissue, 0.1 % or less? Meanwhile I have data about the trace elements of the soft tissue also and the proportion of trace elements is higher in the soft tissue. So I guess it is better to replace the trace elements precipitated in the skeleton than adding no trace elements at all.
Besides the trace elements precipitated with or as carbonates iodine is incorporated into the skeletons of sponges and gorgonians. This and maybe other processes seem to deplete iodine at a high rate, so iodine, like some trace metals, cannot be replaced adequately by water changes allone. The rate given for example by Wilkens or Delbeek and Sprung seems realistic to me and would remove the 60 ppb of iodine of natural seawater (and synthetic seawater prepared with salt mixes) in just a few days.
Here's the Balling continuation of that discussion in the previous post:
Here's Hans Werner's and Lou Ekus's exact comments:
https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/a...rin-balling-system.318541/page-2#post-3981248
"Our Tropic Marin Balling System is really completely balanced and results in calcium, bicarbonate (calcium carbonate + CO2 for coral growth) and complete Pro-Reef sea salt."
and
"The Balling Method published in 1994 just as the Tropic Marin Balling Method only adds calcium, carbonate and bicarbonate and in final outcome a little complete sea salt consisting of all the 79 elements mentioned. It does not contain additional magnesium or trace elements for growth of corals or coralline algae. Magnesium and trace elements consumption by different organisms is different, depending also from the calcium carbonate modification (high magnesium calcite or aragonite) formed by the organisms. A trace element recipe adding some of the essential trace elements in a certain ratio to calcium was first published in the following two years. Magnesium can be tested for and additional magnesium can be added separately."
and
"On the homepage you can find more details:
Concentration of solution:
Calcium chloride dihydrate (part A): 20.000 mg/l (ppm) Ca
Sodium carbonate/sodium bicarbonate (part B): 2800° dKH/l
Sodium chloride free sea salt (part C): 3350 mg/l Mg; 980 mg/l K"
That first statement is EXACTLY what I was demonstrating for a two part, and he clearly says Balling is not, by itself, a trace element supplement. It is the listed ingredients, plus a little bit of balanced salt missing the sodium and chloride.
I dose trace elements daily with calcium and alkalinity. I only had bad experiences (repeatedly) dosing no trace elements. I look at the corals and if the trace elements additions improve polyp opening and growth of corals it is good I guess.
The Balling method itself does not include trace elements additions except the trace elements to balance the sodium and chloride added with the calcium and bicarbonate. But I have also developed a trace elements formula calculated from the trace elements in the skeletons of corals and coralline algae. I frequently got the reply that it does not include the trace elements of the soft tissue. How much of the total dry mass of a scleractinian is soft tissue, 0.1 % or less? Meanwhile I have data about the trace elements of the soft tissue also and the proportion of trace elements is higher in the soft tissue. So I guess it is better to replace the trace elements precipitated in the skeleton than adding no trace elements at all.
Besides the trace elements precipitated with or as carbonates iodine is incorporated into the skeletons of sponges and gorgonians. This and maybe other processes seem to deplete iodine at a high rate, so iodine, like some trace metals, cannot be replaced adequately by water changes allone. The rate given for example by Wilkens or Delbeek and Sprung seems realistic to me and would remove the 60 ppb of iodine of natural seawater (and synthetic seawater prepared with salt mixes) in just a few days.
As you can see in the link I made the trace elements solutions myself. Since I am doing R&D at Tropic Marin now I improved the formula in the link and now it is Tropic Marin K+ and A- Elements.

