Trident FAQ (official)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Terence
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users None

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

interesting, I honestly thought that the trident measured the amount of water coming in for sampling, not that it calculated the 5' hose line in, would like to hear from an official source what it actually does.

There is water in the sample line after each test. They would need to dump it out either after that test or just before it does the next test. If they don’t it will mix with the current SW and throw off the test.
 
interesting, I honestly thought that the trident measured the amount of water coming in for sampling, not that it calculated the 5' hose line in, would like to hear from an official source what it actually does.

They use the known value of the perastilitic pumps to measure. If you cut off 8" of tubing 8" more water is entering the unit than is supposed to. Any sensor that would be able to accurately measure the small amounts involed in these titrations would cause the unit to be more expensive than $600.
 
They use the known value of the perastilitic pumps to measure. If you cut off 8" of tubing 8" more water is entering the unit than is supposed to. Any sensor that would be able to accurately measure the small amounts involved in these titrations would cause the unit to be more expensive than $600.
Your saying more water because the resistance on the motor is less? That would make sense.
The water in the 5' length of hose is not enough to fill the Cuvette to the point where the pump shuts off so it is pulling in extra water no matter what.
 
Your saying more water because the resistance on the motor is less? The water in the 5' length of hose is not enough to fill the Cuovette to the point where the pump shuts off so it is pulling in extra water no matter what.

The units are calibrated to pull enough water for the length of the tube + whatever water is necessary for the test presumably based on time. If you shorten the tube then it decreases the amount pulled into the tube (since there is less of it) thus increasing the amount of water brought into the test vial.
 
The units are calibrated to pull enough water for the length of the tube + whatever water is necessary for the test presumably based on time. If you shorten the tube then it decreases the amount pulled into the tube (since there is less of it) thus increasing the amount of water brought into the test vial.

I am not sure how accurate that is. Pulling with a pump, especially peristaltic, for 10 seconds on a 10 foot tube or a 5 foot tube would take in the same amount of water (ignoring tube friction calculations and assuming sample intake is at same height). There is never air in the line or anything; the tube is already filled with water.

The amount of time the pump runs is designed to “toss” all the old water in the 8ft line, and then get a new sample from the sump to test. And it would also take into account the amount of tube friction loss loss in 8ft of tube, in order to obtain the correct amount of water.

What I am trying to say is that it would never overflow the vial, it just may be slightly (tiny bit) less accurate due to pipe friction. I damaged the sample tube at one point and ran it at ~3ft for a few months with no noticeable changes to the results
 
Last edited:
I am not sure how accurate that is. Pulling with a pump for 10 seconds on a 10 foot tube or a 5 foot tube would take in the same amount of water (ignoring tube friction calculations and assuming sample intake is at same height). There is never air in the line or anything.

The amount of time the peristaltic pump runs is designed to “toss” all the old water in the 8ft line, and then get a new sample from the sump to test. And take into account the amount of friction in 8ft of tube.

What I am trying to say is that it would never overflow the vial, it just may be slightly (tiny bit) less accurate due to pipe friction. I damaged the sample tube at one point and ran it at ~3ft with no noticeable changes to the results.

I cannot say for sure but I am assuming the pumps must run in reverse to clear the lines each testing run to clear out saltwater to ensure a fresh sample is brought in every time as this is the only way other than discarding and the trident produces very little waste. This is a popular function of many high end dosing pumps. That is why the tube length cannot be changed, as the line is filled with air at the start of each testing run.
 
I cannot say for sure but I am assuming the pumps must run in reverse to clear the lines each testing run to clear out saltwater to ensure a fresh sample is brought in every time as this is the only way other than discarding and the trident produces very little waste. This is a popular function of many high end dosing pumps. That is why the tube length cannot be changed, as the line is filled with air at the start of each testing run.

No, it does not run in reverse to my knowledge (I have 2). It simply fills the vial and empties it to prime the line- there is even a function called "Sample priming" which fills the vial and dumps them. Never any air involved on the sample end, which probably helps overall accuracy (no bubble stuck in tubes anywhere).
 
No, it does not run in reverse to my knowledge (I have 2). It simply fills the vial and empties it to prime the line- there is even a function called "Sample priming" which fills the vial and dumps them. Never any air involved on the sample end.

I concede that this makes sense so then the only time sample tube length being shorter would become an issue is during the initial priming.

The tube is not more than 1mm ID which would be 2.3ml of water to clear out the tube.
 
I concede that this makes sense so then the only time sample tube length being shorter would become an issue is during the initial priming.

The tube is not more than 1mm ID which would be 2.3ml of water to clear out the tube.

I had not thought of that for initial priming- but true, that might cause a problem (if it relies on 8ft of tube being empty, and does not drain the vial before attempting to add sample).

Overall its a really cool design. Having a single peristaltic pump and several solenoids means that even if the pump's output changes over time due to wear, ALL of the liquid proportions are effected equally.
 
I had not thought of that for initial priming- but true, that might cause a problem (if it relies on 8ft of tube being empty, and does not drain the vial before attempting to add sample).

Overall its a really cool design. Having a single peristaltic pump and several solenoids means that even if the pump's output changes over time due to wear, ALL of the liquid proportions are effected equally.

Being as important as it is not to cut the feed line, they should write or say it somewhere in the box or set up video. I happened to find it looking thru the FAQ section on their website, unless I missed it. Anyway, will wait a few days before testing it myself and compering it with the trident results. and buy a new feed line once they become available again.
 
Being as important as it is not to cut the feed line, they should write or say it somewhere in the box or set up video. I happened to find it looking thru the FAQ section on their website, unless I missed it. Anyway, will wait a few days before testing it myself and compering it with the trident results. and buy a new feed line once they become available again.

1590876041702.png
 
1590876041702.png

Yup, saw that now, but from the fusion app tutorail it doesn't say that. their website tutorail does i guess. Or maybe I really missed it lol.
 
Yup, saw that now, but from the fusion app tutorail it doesn't say that. their website tutorail does i guess. Or maybe I really missed it lol.
When I got mine it had that card that said to read the instructions on the website fully before you start.
 
This is what was in my box, maybe they've changed it up? Anyway what's done is done, no big deal, will have to wait for the feed line to become available to replace mine :);Meh

trident get started.jpg
 
This is what was in my box, maybe they've changed it up? Anyway what's done is done, no big deal, will have to wait for the feed line to become available to replace mine :);Meh

trident get started.jpg
Thats what I also got in mine.
 
I concede that this makes sense so then the only time sample tube length being shorter would become an issue is during the initial priming.

The tube is not more than 1mm ID which would be 2.3ml of water to clear out the tube.

I also never thought about the priming. You are right, it would affect the priming.
 
Thats what I also got in mine.
Yes! and from the app i followed the tutorial which doesn't say anything about not cutting the line, I contacted neptunesystems support to see if they can help me :|
 
Yup, saw that now, but from the fusion app tutorail it doesn't say that. their website tutorail does i guess. Or maybe I really missed it lol.

They may send you a replacement if you ask support nicely, just a thought.

8" shouldnt make a huge difference as that is less than .5ml
 
They may send you a replacement if you ask support nicely, just a thought.

8" shouldnt make a huge difference as that is less than .5ml

Agreed. After the initialization you mentioned, the tube length plays a very small role. The reduced friction in the tube is pretty minimal. Their warning probably is to obtain the advertised +-.05dkh/15ppm Ca/Mg. I ran with half length for a couple months after I accidentally damaged the tube (rubbed on sharp surface and it was leaking). Only ordered a replacement because I was moving the trident farther away :)
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top