You mean because people may overshoot to the low side, or because you are concerned about the methods themselves?
If it is the former, why are "artificial" methods (whatever those are in your definition) worse than "natural" methods?
If I may take a crack at a question not really directed at me. I’m going to fudge the artificial thing and give it my own definition.
I’m correct in understanding almost anything taking nutrients out of solution is going to shift the equilibrium point of nutrients in solution down a bit or a lot of its good at it?
If there is one thing doing this and there’s a lot of that thing the equilibrium would settle at a level where that thing is having a hard time taking up more. That may be zero, but it could also be a bit higher, correct?
If you have two things doing it, one of them could still be quite active even when the other has hit its limit and the equilibrium would then settle at a level where the more efficient of the two is hitting its limit.
Now I get in our systems there are lots of things, but there are biological and inorganic methods speaking generally. If the inorganic methods set an equilibrium more than a days feeding below the level at which corals can get to the stuff then the corals are generally out of luck and either get a lot of particulate food or starve. If on the other hand you’re using chaeto, it’s possible the chaeto has similar limits to the coral. Even if you wring it’s neck, as soon as you feed the level gets back up to a coral friendly level and stays there for a while.
It’s speculation on my part, but there is certainly a mechanism which would make biological removal less stressful than inorganic removal. Bacteria and carbon complicated things, but perhaps the amount of carbon is driving it sufficiently that it just overperforms. On the other hand, a Zeo tank is a bacteria driven tank and my corals are growing. Perhaps depletion by carbon dosing isn’t as risky as GFO depletion?
Does it work that way? You’d have to ask someone that knows a lot more than I do. That’s probably half the forum, but that’s why it’s fun to speculate.



DSC_0006

