Ultra Low Nutrients - without trying

ArcKatana

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
99
Reaction score
32
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
After spending the past couple of days reading about Triton/Zeovit/Aquaforest stuff, something just sort of clicked in my head and won't go away:

If I'm keeping an ultra low nutrient system (1-2 fish in 130-140G of water - one tang, one wrasse), feeding once a day, why do I need a special reactor, when the ONLY nutrients that are going in are the stuff I'm putting in?

I get that certain things will be used up by the corals, I'll check for those and dose accordingly. It's understandable that amino acids/other minerals/vitamans/proteins/etc will be used as well.

With a bigger than needed skimmer (I've got one that is for 200G, and with such a small bioload it's going to be way overkill), filter socks changed daily, and passive chemipure/carbon/whatever in a bag, it seems to me I'm wasting money by setting up a reactor and dosing carbon/vodka/etc. There won't be enough food to cause nutrient build up, and with 10% weekly water changes, I probably won't even have to dose two part. Granted, once there are colonies in there, sure it will need additional ca/mg/alk, but up until then I can't see how it makes sense.

Maybe I'm just slow, but after weeks of seeing great Nano SPS tanks doing the same thing I've just described above, why wouldn't it scale up?
 
You're right. It works on my 40b. Also, with such a low bioload, zeovit is not worth it. Just dose aminos or prodibio and ur fine

Good luck!
 
My opinion: A low nutrient system is much easier to achieve these days due to two major factors:

1) Skimmers are VERY efficient at doing what they do

2) Hobbiest are more aware of how much they feed their tanks, and probably underfeeding most of the time.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top