Using ChatGPT to design a light

MoshJosh

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 27, 2022
Messages
3,968
Reaction score
4,419
Location
Grand Junction
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
For fun I asked ChatGPT to help me choose what ratios of what spectrums to use for growing corals.

Prompt was a 12 diode light.

With my "help" it came up with:
  • Blue: 3 LEDs (25%)
  • Violet: 1 LED (8-9%)
  • Royal Blue: 3 LEDs (25%)
  • Cyan: 2 LEDs (16-17%)
  • Red: 1 LED (8-9%)
  • Cool White: 2 LEDs (16-17%)
But what SURPRISED me was chatGPT's suggesting for a "better" set up/ration. . . it suggested:

  • Blue: 4 LEDs (33%)
  • Royal Blue: 3 LEDs (25%)
  • Cyan: 2 LEDs (16-17%)
  • Violet: 1 LED (8-9%)
  • Deep Red: 1 LED (8-9%)
  • Warm White: 1 LED (8-9%)
ChatGPT "thinks" the warm white and deep red will:

"
Warm white light, which includes a mix of wavelengths across the visible spectrum, can help provide a more natural lighting appearance and balance the overall color rendition in the tank. It can also enhance visual aesthetics and promote the growth of symbiotic algae (zooxanthellae) that live within the coral.

Deep red light in the range of 660-680nm has been shown to influence coral behavior, such as polyp expansion and coral fluorescence. While it may not directly contribute to photosynthesis, it can still have positive effects on certain coral species by stimulating specific pigments and enhancing their coloration."

what is everyones thoughts?
 
1688774007224.gif
 
Deep red light in the range of 660-680nm has been shown to influence coral behavior, such as polyp expansion and coral fluorescence.

That's not accurate. To excite fluorescence, the light needs to be shorter wavelength - higher energy than the fluorescent light emission. If
660-680nm excited any fluorescent pigments, the emitted light would be longer wavelength and thus too red to see.
 
That's not accurate. To excite fluorescence, the light needs to be shorter wavelength - higher energy than the fluorescent light emission. If
660-680nm excited any fluorescent pigments, the emitted light would be longer wavelength and thus too red to see.
I seem to remember a study done with pocillopora that showed that red light inhibited growth.
 
I seem to remember a study done with pocillopora that showed that red light inhibited growth.

Correct but that was high par red and
" alone" or with a minimal " other" spectrum.
Sooo don't run 100% red light
 
That program doesn't think for itself. It scours the internet for articles and opinions. So maybe it's right or maybe it's some random guys opinion. Any second hand information is never going to be as good as first hand knowledge.
 
GraphSpectrums_About-Photosynthesis_Chlorophyll-white.png


Around what wavelength does that big peak on the right of the chart look like to you?
It’s been a long time since I researched this topic. I first looked into it because I just gotten the newly released ap700 and wanted to simulate a sunrise/sunset. I programmed them to start and end with full reds.

What I think I remember was the case was that Zooxanthellae used chlorophyll A and C but not B. This is why the reds played no role in photosynthesis for this organism. I could be wrong though. Maybe @Dana Riddle has some
insight on this.
 
It’s been a long time since I researched this topic. I first looked into it because I just gotten the newly released ap700 and wanted to simulate a sunrise/sunset. I programmed them to start and end with full reds.

What I think I remember was the case was that Zooxanthellae used chlorophyll A and C but not B. This is why the reds played no role in photosynthesis for this organism. I could be wrong though. Maybe @Dana Riddle has some
insight on this.

The magenta line on the graph is for Chlorophyl A. Big spike around 450nm, and another big spike up in the 670-680nm range.
 
It’s been a long time since I researched this topic. I first looked into it because I just gotten the newly released ap700 and wanted to simulate a sunrise/sunset. I programmed them to start and end with full reds.

What I think I remember was the case was that Zooxanthellae used chlorophyll A and C but not B. This is why the reds played no role in photosynthesis for this organism. I could be wrong though. Maybe @Dana Riddle has some
insight on this.


Perhaps the real story here is the photo-protective responses (the xanthophyll cycle) of zooxanthellae to different light sources, especially red light. Why is there little, if any, protective cycling of xanthophylls when strong red light is used? Strong doses of red light can regulate zooxanthellae densities even to the point of bleaching (Kinzie et al., 1984). What are the long term effects of red light on captive corals? This deserves investigation, and will be the subject of a future report.
 
Last edited:
Ignore,
Wrong place.
 
Last edited:

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%

New Posts

Back
Top