UV Sterilizer, thoughts?
- Thread starter Z06-Hec
- Start date
- Tagged users None
fi.na.tine
New Member
I have one and have gone through bouts of ich and a bad case of velvet that killed a bunch of fish. I almost wonder if it was worth it.
OP
OP
Z06-Hec
Valuable Member
interesting....
I have had ich before and 1 tang died and he was a baby, tiny. Everyone else lived, with out a sterilizer. IMO i have good flow in the tank and i think that helped save everyone else... and good feeding.
The one that did die didnt eat as much, he couldnt hold his own against the clowns bullying him.
Oddly enough i had another baby tang that fought the clown back and makes sure she eats alot... she lived...
I have had ich before and 1 tang died and he was a baby, tiny. Everyone else lived, with out a sterilizer. IMO i have good flow in the tank and i think that helped save everyone else... and good feeding.
The one that did die didnt eat as much, he couldnt hold his own against the clowns bullying him.
Oddly enough i had another baby tang that fought the clown back and makes sure she eats alot... she lived...
pickupman66
5000 Club Member
So, a properly sized and operated UV sterilizer will do just that. sterilize and remove free floating parasites and such in the water. They do so indiscriminately. so they kill both good and bad. I have used in the past to rid some infection and it worked well. I dont use one now.
In the past with heavily stocked fish only systems I used a properly sized UV and swear by them for their ability to keep fish healthier. I dcould visually see the difference when the sleeve was dirty or the bulb was losing strength or when the flow/velocity was too high for a good inactivation rate.
I will not use one in a reef system though as already mentioned, they inactivate the good along with the bad so they cannot reproduce. They do have some effect on algae but I have never had an algae problem with my reefs without one.
I will not use one in a reef system though as already mentioned, they inactivate the good along with the bad so they cannot reproduce. They do have some effect on algae but I have never had an algae problem with my reefs without one.
lefkonj
Active Member
I have one, but I think its in the application. Some people don't push enough or too much water through the device. I know people who have it in line with the return and others have it as part of the media reactors... it really depends and doesn't seem to be an exact science or maybe its so exact we can't master it.
ReeferRookie
Well-Known Member
Its alright. I have one ive noticed cleaner water. Hasnt harmes anything to my knowlege since adding it ive seen improvement
Bernardhny
Active Member
Pre UV my tank was susceptible to ich. Post UV I have never had any kind of disease attack my tank. I use a little 9 watt in tank unit. Is it working? Seems to be.
Ibassfsh
Community Member
UV sterilzer
I bought one when I first entered into the hobby. I never did see a lot of value in it. I prefer ozone generators over UV sterilizers for water quality. Never had no luck with the sterilizer preventing ich as well or any other disease.
I bought one when I first entered into the hobby. I never did see a lot of value in it. I prefer ozone generators over UV sterilizers for water quality. Never had no luck with the sterilizer preventing ich as well or any other disease.
marke
Active Member
I'm not sure a uv helps with water clarity. Uv in a fish only system are ok. Detrimental in a reef tank. Uv can kill bacteria. Bacteria is a major component in reducing nitrate and phosphates via denitrification. Some people dose vinager/vodka to increase bacteria so as to reduce nutrients Killing these bacteria is no good
fish master
New Member
I use both ozone and a uv on my tanks ...I know some people would disagree but there are benifits to both . Orp in morning is over 425 and with the uv have had no outbreaks of any disease as of yet . Have been doing this many years . I did notice in this thread that someone looked like they were having a better look with yhe corals with the uv off . Can only speak for myself and public aquariums .
Randy Holmes-Farley
Reef Chemist
Staff member
Super Moderator
Excellence Award
Expert Contributor
Article Contributor
R2R Research
My Tank Thread
I'm not convinced a uv is worth the money as I doubt it helps much and I don't really want to kill most of the circulating bacteria.
Bernardhny
Active Member
The UV filter is only going to zap the bacteria free floating in the water column that makes it into the filter. Most of the beneficial bacteria is going to be attached to the sand or rock. I thought the idea was to kill off the parasites in the water column.
Randy Holmes-Farley
Reef Chemist
Staff member
Super Moderator
Excellence Award
Expert Contributor
Article Contributor
R2R Research
My Tank Thread
Yes, bacteria performing the nitrogen cycle are certainly mostly on rocks and such and a UV won't impact them.
But I don't think a UV kills many "parasites" (at least not generally enough to treat ich, for example) and I don't want to kill the free floating bacteria. I want them to be food for creatures (that's a main reason I dose vinegar; to encourage bacterial growth to supply food to sponges and other filter feeders).
I don't prefer the bacteria in the water column to be dead hulks that spill their guts after passing through a UV.
But I don't think a UV kills many "parasites" (at least not generally enough to treat ich, for example) and I don't want to kill the free floating bacteria. I want them to be food for creatures (that's a main reason I dose vinegar; to encourage bacterial growth to supply food to sponges and other filter feeders).
I don't prefer the bacteria in the water column to be dead hulks that spill their guts after passing through a UV.
