Versa When to Replace Tubing

JAMSOURY

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2017
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
467
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
For the kamoer peristaltic pump it recommends replacing the tubing every 3 months if running continuous. No info on that for the Versa. Should we replace it about 3 months as well? I know the tubing setup cost more than kamoer replacements
 
Theres no official replacement requirement. They chose a tube with better resiliency than the kamoer.

Ecotech has simulated 100s of years of awc with the same tube.

I would approach tube replacement like this: whenever the monthly calibration is so far off (20%) the previous presaved settings, I would order a replacement.
 
Theres no official replacement requirement. They chose a tube with better resiliency than the kamoer.

Ecotech has simulated 100s of years of awc with the same tube.

I would approach tube replacement like this: whenever the monthly calibration is so far off (20%) the previous presaved settings, I would order a replacement.

i would like to see how they are claiming/touting doing 100s of years of awc in the same tube.

the "same tube" claim is just unbelievable to me. i have just reported my versa tubing going bad after 3months of usage in the calrx application. therefore i cannot see how this claim can be remotely true.
104242383_1739471259529375_5765183326579437800_n.jpg
 
@dragonfisher33 I replied to your other post but I am going to put it here also...

Those look like crimp fittings holding the hose on. If they are, they can be removed with the crimp tool (or screwdriver, or other tool). Sometimes they can be reused. If you can buy the hose then you could save some money.
I know it does not solve the problem of the part wearing out fast, but it may give you another option when they do wear out.
 
What speed were you running it at?

i would like to see how they are claiming/touting doing 100s of years of awc in the same tube.

the "same tube" claim is just unbelievable to me. i have just reported my versa tubing going bad after 3months of usage in the calrx application. therefore i cannot see how this claim can be remotely true.
104242383_1739471259529375_5765183326579437800_n.jpg
 
i would like to see how they are claiming/touting doing 100s of years of awc in the same tube.

the "same tube" claim is just unbelievable to me. i have just reported my versa tubing going bad after 3months of usage in the calrx application. therefore i cannot see how this claim can be remotely true.
104242383_1739471259529375_5765183326579437800_n.jpg
Were you pushing through the reactor or pulling?
 
Good, and why do you say the tube assembly is bad? Are they leaking? Do they have tears in the tube? Are you no longer able to calibrate them?

it’s bad because it’s now harden and the roller will not bable able to squeeze the liquid inside the tubing to achieve the liquid output.
 
Curious why one would think pushing versus pulling through a CaRx would make any difference to tubing life. I don’t own a versa (anymore) but surely those crimps can be cut out and new tubing bulk sourced and reconnected with zip ties. That what I do for both my MasterFlex and DOS pumps (though it did take me a while to get the right peri tubing for the latter).
 
Curious why one would think pushing versus pulling through a CaRx would make any difference to tubing life. I don’t own a versa (anymore) but surely those crimps can be cut out and new tubing bulk sourced and reconnected with zip ties. That what I do for both my MasterFlex and DOS pumps (though it did take me a while to get the right peri tubing for the latter).

im with you with respect to pulling vs pushing, I’m just going by their recommendation as not to get out of line.
 
Is this a real thing esp 3 months with Kamoer as well? The spectrapure LM3 just works and keeps working without failure for AWC. Best on the market imo. I was going to grab a Kamoer 4 head pump to replace a real old bubble magus 3 channel doser for my dosing needs. Almost better to go with a 2nd LM3 if these are all need such frequent tube changes?
 
Is this a real thing esp 3 months with Kamoer as well? The spectrapure LM3 just works and keeps working without failure for AWC. Best on the market imo. I was going to grab a Kamoer 4 head pump to replace a real old bubble magus 3 channel doser for my dosing needs. Almost better to go with a 2nd LM3 if these are all need such frequent tube changes?
Depends on your usage and application. For dosing of 2-part/amino acid, I don’t see it as a problems

but if you use it for continuous (note: not automatic water change) water change or calcium reactor, then you need to look elsewhere
 
Curious why one would think pushing versus pulling through a CaRx would make any difference to tubing life.

It's an inherent trait for all peristaltic pumps. Being that they are positive displacement pumps they're work better when pushing rather than pulling.

When pulling, a vacuum is created on the backside (inlet side) and strains the resiliency of the soft tube. External pressures act upon it trying to collapse it. The greater the vacuum the greater the force trying to collapse the tube.

If you limit the restriction on the backside the integrity of the tubes elasticity will last longer.

Pushing on the other hand is where a positive displacement pump shines. Your biggest limitation is the amount of torque available from the motor.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top