Waterbox 20 or IM25 Lagoon?(diving back in...)

Seanano

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
36
Reaction score
7
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Getting back in to the hobby after a long hiatus.. Much has changed. The itch never goes away. So that said, I'm really stuck between the WB20 and the IM25. The WB is a beautiful tank, the lack of aftermarket support and the glass false wall are concerning. The IM25 I worry maybe too shallow and slightly more expensive. I currently have a RapidLED Corona which I plan on using that was given to me and worry on the lagoon it maybe too much. Any nudge or insights that can be given from owners of either would be greatly appreciated.
 
Welcome back and to R2R... never had a WB, but enjoyed my IM very much. Only input I can offer :)

welcome.gif
 
I went with IM due to the back panel glass in the WB aquariums...didnt want my equipment to show
 
Despite popular opinion, I went w/ the WB20. I ended up stopping into their official office not realizing it was not an actual store, just saw a giant WaterBox sign. That said, Dean, I believe his name was showed me around and all the tanks they had through out their offices answered any questions. The tanks are beautiful. My entire experience was great. I was really leaning towards the IM, but between the experience I had at WB and the extra height, which from where it will be viewed most often it just seemed a better fit. Coupled w/ seeing MisterNanoReef's I really like his tank. We'll see how it unfolds.

R2TH Thanks for the welcome(back)!
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top