Waterbox 60.2 Macro in sump?

Morrissey

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 12, 2021
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Location
Collingswood
What state or country do you live in
New Jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey all,

I have the marine x 60.2 waterbox aquarium. The sump does not have a specific refugium section, however there is space in the first section before skimmer were the display drains into. Could I try chaeto in there with a solid light? My goal is to lower nutrients and out compete hair algae in the main display.

Thanks!
 
You mean before the filter socks, right? If so, no - you don’t want a refugium there.
I have heard that Chaetomorpha and Ulva can be used as mechanical filtration, but I have no experience with this. I couldn’t imagine them as efficient at removing particulates as filter socks, though.
 
Hey all,

I have the marine x 60.2 waterbox aquarium. The sump does not have a specific refugium section, however there is space in the first section before skimmer were the display drains into. Could I try chaeto in there with a solid light? My goal is to lower nutrients and out compete hair algae in the main display.

Thanks!
You could try cheato or ulva in a small planter basket with a light above it. This would keep it contained and create less of a mess.
 
I have the marine X 110.4 I think the sumps are a bit different is this where the pipes go into then it drains to socks? I was running lowing Nitrates and Phosphates. I ended up taking down my nyos skimmer and just making a fuge with no skimmer. I honestly think you should be fine in that section
 
I have the marine X 110.4 I think the sumps are a bit different is this where the pipes go into then it drains to socks? I was running lowing Nitrates and Phosphates. I ended up taking down my nyos skimmer and just making a fuge with no skimmer. I honestly think you should be fine in that section
If the section empties into the filter socks, having a refugium there is just going to clog them up prematurely.
 
If the section empties into the filter socks, having a refugium there is just going to clog them up prematurely.
Yeah your right. I was thinking about him sectioning it off somehow but honestly it is such a small water volume not worth even trying. Best bet for OP is to run a refugium reactor
 
cut a piece of glass to the good dimensions (local hardware store did it), a little bit of silicone, piece of eggcrate glued to the top, and voilà, home-made refugium in my 60.2 fuge, total cost, less than 20$, still enough room for the skimmer.
IMG_9623.jpg
 
Thank you all! a fuge reactor is interesting, I have read mixed reviews some say its tough to clean and maintain consistently. Any thoughts? I have a large tunze skimmer in that section so I think it'll be a tight squeeze trying to fit a fuge in that section. I wish I thought of modifying the sump before setup. I mainly wanted to grow chaeto just for nutrient export to slowly keep phosphate in check.
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top