- Joined
- Jun 24, 2019
- Messages
- 5,023
- Reaction score
- 4,995
Didnt read but peppermeint shrimp are my go to a wholes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a good start but you still have to use a calibration solution with the Milwaukee to see if it is "off". Your 1.022 may actually turn out to be 1.020. Either reading could easily be the cause of your coral problem.So upon zeroing my Milwaukee unit with RODI and getting a 1.000 reading I put some water from the tank on and got a 1.022 reading. I did recently (prior to testing) hear the ATO going. That was about 20-30min prior to testing.
What did the shrimp unbury? What other metals (if any) were elevated besides tin? Thanks.Glad you found the zeroing issue. As Randy also suggested, I would get a ICP test done. Never know if there is a contamination source hidden in the tank somewhere.
Me personally had ICP tests showing high tin and other contaminants. I couldn't find the source for 6 months so I was forced to do weekly 50% water changes. Then one day it mysteriously appeared, my pistol shrimp must've unburied it I think. Now my sps are finally taking off.
A single ICP test is definently with the high price
What did the shrimp unbury? What other metals (if any) were elevated besides tin? Thanks.
I was interested to see if other metals were elevated to support or refute the idea that "if tin is the only metal elevated, then it is most likely coming from plastics or glass (rather than a corroding metal)". Thanks for helping!It was a metal ribbon from Christmas decorations. It originally has a thick purple powdery paint with glitter infused in it. The metal was in the outer edges to allow it to be "shaped". Well after 10 months in the tank, all the paint was gone and 90% of the metal was dissolved. I started losing a couple sps colonies in February and most of my LPS was retracted. It was then that I started icp testing and performing large water changes. I stopped losing colonies but my corals weren't growing. After I removed the ribbon, my corals are growing again and everything is looking great.
Just goes to show that even if parameters and stability are great, there can always be another variable affecting coral.
Oh, and I can look up the other contaminants when I get home, I don't remember off the top of my head. Just the tin because that was the highest.
I didn’t think that was too much variability in temperature but I could be wrong. Most things I’ve read or seen provide that as the range to target for temperature. What do you have your range at?I noticed something else with the provided parameters. The way I read your temp (77-79F) says you have quite a swing in my opinion. Is there anyway to reduce that daily temp change to get more stability?
Just a thought.
I keep mine at 77.0 - 77.7 F. My personal goal is to always maintain a constant with any parameter, and reduce daily swings as much as possible.I didn’t think that was too much variability in temperature but I could be wrong. Most things I’ve read or seen provide that as the range to target for temperature. What do you have your range at?
Ok thanks good to knowI keep mine at 77.0 - 77.7 F. My personal goal is to always maintain a constant with any parameter, and reduce daily swings as much as possible.
My thought is that we always try to acclimate new additions to our systems, but if the system's parameter swings are too aggressive throughout the day, then when can the current inhabitants ever get comfortable and truly adjusted.
Note: I keep my system at the listed temp, but many have kept theirs higher, but with minimal daily swing (which is more important).
Is there a digital refractor that you are a fan of? My eyes are getting to bad to read a normal refractor. A digital read out screen is easier for me.While I'm not a fan of the Milwaukee refractometer, zeroing it with pure fresh water and then, and later checking it with a standard are all you can do.
I recommend a conductivity meter over a refractometer.Is there a digital refractor that you are a fan of? My eyes are getting to bad to read a normal refractor. A digital read out screen is easier for me.
Yes I’m planning to raise the salinity into the 1.025-.026 range to eliminate that variable. I do agree at that salinity I should be seeing what I’m seeing in the tank.Second the ICP recommendation. Let’s assume your salinity is 1.024–that’s not optimal but can’t imagine it would account for the impact you’re seeing on your corals.
Separately you might want to consider targeting a .001sg increase in salinity just to improve that piece of it, although probably not going to be a miracle.
Any chance it’s a pest, a fish, or chemical warfare? (Can’t hurt to run GAC in case it’s chem warfare.)
What’s GAC?Second the ICP recommendation. Let’s assume your salinity is 1.024–that’s not optimal but can’t imagine it would account for the impact you’re seeing on your corals.
Separately you might want to consider targeting a .001sg increase in salinity just to improve that piece of it, although probably not going to be a miracle.
Any chance it’s a pest, a fish, or chemical warfare? (Can’t hurt to run GAC in case it’s chem warfare.)
Granular activated carbon. Either in a reactor or sometimes put in a bag just dropped in sump but less effectiveWhat’s GAC?

